Phylogeny of Osmundaceae inferred from rbcL nucleotide sequences and comparison to the fossil evidences

被引:57
作者
Yatabe, Y
Nishida, H
Murakami, N
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Bot, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[2] Chuo Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Lab Biosphere Sci, Tokyo 1128551, Japan
关键词
Osmundaceae; rbcL; living fossil; molecular phylogeny;
D O I
10.1007/PL00013894
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We determined rbcL sequences of 11 of 15 extant species of Osmundaceae which represent all three genera, Osmunda, Todea and Leptopteris. Our phylogenetic analysis concluded: 1) Osmunda subg. Osmunda and subg. Plenasium are monophyletic groups, but subg. Osmunda strum is not. The genus Osmunda is not monophyletic because Todea and Leptopteris are positioned within Osmunda. 2) Osmonda cinnamomea is the most basally positioned species in Osmundaceae, and it can be called as "a living fossil" because a fossil species (O. claytoniites) with almost the same morphology as this species was recorded from the Triassic. 3) Osmunda japonica and O. regalis are very closely related with only one nucleotide difference in the rbcL gene. 4) Greater nucleotide variation (5-7 nucleotides) was found between conspecific samples of O. cinnamomea and O. claytoniana collected from Japan and United States. Each of these two species may comprise more than two biologically differentiated species.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 404
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, YORKSHIRE JURASSIC F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1868, SYNOPSIS FILICUM SYN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
[4]  
Arnold CA, 1964, MEM TORREY BOT CLUB, V21, P58
[5]   EXTENSIVE VARIATION IN EVOLUTIONARY RATE OF RBCL GENE-SEQUENCES AMONG SEED PLANTS [J].
BOUSQUET, J ;
STRAUSS, SH ;
DOERKSEN, AH ;
PRICE, RA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (16) :7844-7848
[6]   PHYLOGENETICS OF SEED PLANTS - AN ANALYSIS OF NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCES FROM THE PLASTID GENE RBCL [J].
CHASE, MW ;
SOLTIS, DE ;
OLMSTEAD, RG ;
MORGAN, D ;
LES, DH ;
MISHLER, BD ;
DUVALL, MR ;
PRICE, RA ;
HILLS, HG ;
QIU, YL ;
KRON, KA ;
RETTIG, JH ;
CONTI, E ;
PALMER, JD ;
MANHART, JR ;
SYTSMA, KJ ;
MICHAELS, HJ ;
KRESS, WJ ;
KAROL, KG ;
CLARK, WD ;
HEDREN, M ;
GAUT, BS ;
JANSEN, RK ;
KIM, KJ ;
WIMPEE, CF ;
SMITH, JF ;
FURNIER, GR ;
STRAUSS, SH ;
XIANG, QY ;
PLUNKETT, GM ;
SOLTIS, PS ;
SWENSEN, SM ;
WILLIAMS, SE ;
GADEK, PA ;
QUINN, CJ ;
EGUIARTE, LE ;
GOLENBERG, E ;
LEARN, GH ;
GRAHAM, SW ;
BARRETT, SCH ;
DAYANANDAN, S ;
ALBERT, VA .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 1993, 80 (03) :528-580
[7]  
Diels L, 1898, NATURL PFLANZ, P372
[8]  
Doyle JJ, 1987, PHYTOCHEMISTRY B, V19, P11
[9]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
[10]  
Felsenstein J, 1995, PHYLIP PHYLOGENY INF