Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label phase II multicentre trial (COVeRT study)

被引:12
作者
Singhal, Nimit [1 ]
Mislang, Anna [1 ]
Karapetis, Christos S. [4 ]
Stephens, Sonya [1 ]
Borg, Martin [2 ]
Woodman, Richard J. [5 ]
Pittman, Kenneth [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Med Oncol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Woodville South, SA, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Ctr Innovat Canc, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Flinders Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
chemoradiation; cisplatin; non-small-cell lung cancer; oral vinorelbine; CONCURRENT CHEST RADIATION; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; CONSOLIDATION THERAPY; SOLID TUMORS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; ETOPOSIDE; DOCETAXEL; NSCLC;
D O I
10.1097/CAD.0000000000000291
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Chemoradiotherapy regimens for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require ongoing evaluation. This South Australian multicentre prospective phase II study evaluated the safety, activity and outcomes of combination oral vinorelbine and cisplatin administered concurrently with radiotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Consecutive eligible patients received two cycles of oral vinorelbine 50 mg/m(2) day 1 (D1), day 8 (D8) and intravenous cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) D1 and D8 in a 21-day cycle. Chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy at 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction to the isocentre, all fields treated daily, 5 days a week over 6 weeks using 10 MV photons and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points were safety, response rates and overall survival (OS). Forty-three eligible patients with stage III NSCLC - comprising 21 squamous cell carcinoma, 18 adenocarcinoma and four large cell carcinoma - were studied. Four patients did not complete the treatment. By intention-to-treat analysis, 25% showed a partial response and 65% had stable disease. None achieved a complete response. Of the 39 patients who completed protocol-specified treatment, 11 (28%) showed a partial response and 28 (72%) had stable disease. The median PFS was 25.2 months and the median OS was 48.3 months. Toxicities were manageable and generally mild, with the majority being either grade 1 (n = 38) or grade 2 (n = 21). Toxicities were mainly of oesophagitis, pneumonitis, fatigue, nausea and dysphagia. Two cycles of chemotherapy with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin administered concurrently with radical radiation had an acceptable toxicity profile and was active in inoperable stage III NSCLC. PFS and OS outcomes were encouraging. This regimen warrants further investigation. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1088
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2012, J CLIN ONCOL S, DOI DOI 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7001
[2]
[Anonymous], AUSTR I HLTH WELF AU
[3]
Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Auperin, Anne ;
Le Pechoux, Cecile ;
Rolland, Estelle ;
Curran, Walter J. ;
Furuse, Kiyoyuki ;
Fournel, Pierre ;
Belderbos, Jose ;
Clamon, Gerald ;
Ulutin, Hakki Cuneyt ;
Paulus, Rebecca ;
Yamanaka, Takeharu ;
Bozonnat, Marie-Cecile ;
Uitterhoeve, Apollonia ;
Wang, Xiaofei ;
Stewart, Lesley ;
Arriagada, Rodrigo ;
Burdett, Sarah ;
Pignon, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (13) :2181-2190
[4]
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) ACIM, 2012, ACIM AUSTR CANC INC
[5]
Bedano PM, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p374S
[6]
RADIATION EFFECTS ON THE LUNG - CLINICAL-FEATURES, PATHOLOGY, AND IMAGING FINDINGS [J].
DAVIS, SD ;
YANKELEVITZ, DF ;
HENSCHKE, CI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (06) :1157-1164
[7]
Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin followed by consolidation therapy with oral vinorelbine in advanced NSCLC [J].
De Lena, M ;
Ramlau, R ;
Hansen, O ;
Lorusso, V ;
Wagner, L ;
Barni, S ;
Cristovao, MM ;
Huber, R ;
Alberola, V ;
Mitrovic, M ;
Colin, C ;
Gasmi, J .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 48 (01) :129-135
[8]
VINORELBINE VERSUS VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DEPIERRE, A ;
CHASTANG, C ;
QUOIX, E ;
LEBEAU, B ;
BLANCHON, F ;
PAILLOT, N ;
LEMARIE, E ;
MILLERON, B ;
MORO, D ;
CLAVIER, J ;
HERMAN, D ;
TUCHAIS, E ;
JACOULET, P ;
BRECHOT, JM ;
CORDIER, JF ;
SOLALCELIGNY, P ;
BADRI, N ;
BESENVAL, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (01) :37-42
[9]
Oral Vinorelbine and Cisplatin with Concurrent Radiotherapy After Induction Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Docetaxel for Patients with Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer The GFPC 05-03 Study [J].
Descourt, Renaud ;
Vergnenegre, Alain ;
Barlesi, Fabrice ;
Lena, Herve ;
Fournel, Pierre ;
Falchero, Lionel ;
Berard, Henri ;
Hureaux, Jose ;
Le Caer, Herve ;
Chavaillon, Jean Michel ;
Geriniere, Laurence ;
Monnet, Isabelle ;
Chouabe, Stephane ;
Robinet, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (02) :351-357
[10]
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247