Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis

被引:60
作者
Kong, Choy Wah [1 ]
Leung, Tse Ngong [1 ]
Leung, Tak Yeung [1 ]
Chan, Lin Wai [1 ]
Sahota, Daljit Singh [1 ]
Fung, Tak Yuen [1 ]
Lau, Tze Kin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Fetal Med Unit, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
genetic amniocentesis; complications; risk factors; fetal sex;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1528
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to determine the institutional pregnancy loss rate following second-trimester genetic amniocentesis and to ascertain whether factors exist which would identify pregnancies at increased risk of having a procedure-related fetal loss. Setting University Teaching Hospital Methods Details of the procedure and pregnancy outcome of all patients who had amniocentesis planned or performed between 15-22 gestational weeks between January 1997 and June 2004 were extracted from our clinical audit database. The procedure-related fetal loss rate, defined as all unintended abortions, stillbirths and neonatal deaths without major fetal abnormalities or obvious obstetric causes, was determined and compared to a presumed background fetal loss rate of 0.8% based on a cohort of women who did not undergo the procedure. Results A total of 3468 consecutive amniocentesis were performed in 3440 patients with 3498 fetuses. The mean gestational age at amniocentesis was 17.6 +/- 1.2 weeks. The majority (98.6%) required only one puncture and a transplacental procedure was required in 2.7% cases. A total of 3465 chromosomal studies were performed. Sixty six cases (1.9%) of major chromosomal abnormalities were detected. Pregnancy outcome was ascertained in all except 26 singleton pregnancies (0.74%). There were 3285 (93.9%) livebirths, 103 (2.9%) termination of pregnancies (TOP), 6 (0.17%) fetal demises before the procedure, and 20 (0.61%) unintended fetal losses due to significant fetal abnormalities or obstetric complications. The remaining 58 fetal losses (1.66%) were classified as potentially procedure-related, which could be either background fetal losses or procedure-related. The procedure-related fetal loss rate after correcting for the background loss rate was 0.86%. Potentially procedure-related fetal losses were found to be significantly associated with a procedure at 18 weeks or beyond (odds ratio OR = 1.97), a procedure performed for abnormal second-trimester biochemical screening test (OR = 3.08), a bloody tap (OR = 6.48), and a female fetus (OR = 2.39); but not to the number of punctures (p = 0.66) nor transplacental amniocentesis (p = 0.104). Conclusions Mid-trimester amniocentesis is associated with a small but significant risk of fetal loss of 0.86%. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 930
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Five-year experience with midtrimester amniocentesis performed by a single group of obstetricians-gynecologists at a community hospital [J].
Blackwell, SC ;
Abundis, MG ;
Nehra, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1130-1132
[2]  
CRANDALL BF, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P625
[3]   A single physician's experience with four thousand six hundred genetic amniocenteses [J].
Horger, EO ;
Finch, H ;
Vincent, VA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (02) :279-287
[4]   Fetal sex as a risk factor for fetal distress leading to abdominal delivery [J].
Lau, TK ;
Chung, TKH ;
Haines, CJ ;
Chang, AMZ .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 36 (02) :146-149
[5]   A classification of pregnancy losses after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: an approach to allow comparison of units with a different case mix [J].
Nanal, R ;
Kyle, P ;
Soothill, PW .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (06) :488-492
[6]   Genetic amniocentesis complications:: Is the incidence overrated? [J].
Nassar, AH ;
Martin, D ;
González-Quintero, VH ;
Gómez-Marín, O ;
Salman, F ;
Gutierrez, A ;
O'Sullivan, MJ .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2004, 58 (02) :100-104
[7]   Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesis [J].
Papantoniou, NE ;
Daskalakis, GJ ;
Tziotis, JG ;
Kitmirides, SJ ;
Mesogitis, SA ;
Antsaklis, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (10) :1053-1056
[8]   Pregnancy loss rates following second trimester genetic amniocentesis [J].
Reid, KP ;
Gurrin, LC ;
Dickinson, JE ;
Newnham, JP ;
Phillips, JM .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (03) :281-285
[9]  
Roper EC, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P803, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<803::AID-PD638>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-D