Technological scope: diversified or specialized

被引:13
作者
Chiu, Yi-Chia [1 ]
Lai, Hsien-Che [2 ,3 ]
Liaw, Yi-Ching [1 ]
Lee, Tai-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Grad Inst Business Adm, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[2] Natl Univ Tainan, Dept Business & Management, Tainan 702, Taiwan
[3] Natl Univ Tainan, Grad Inst Technol Management, Tainan 702, Taiwan
关键词
Technological scope; Technological diversification; Technological specialization; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; JAPANESE INDUSTRY; TASK ENVIRONMENTS; CAUSAL MODEL; STRATEGY; IMPACT; CAPABILITIES; ORGANIZATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-009-0039-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although the topic of technological diversification has been a major source of research, only a few studies have explored the determinant variables of technological scope decisions. The present study enhances our understanding of the determinants of a firm's technological scope strategy. After reviewing the related literatures, we proposed and empirically tested a conceptual model from the perspective of the firm's environment, strategic orientation, and resources. The results suggest that the coherence between technological scope decisions and proposed model is significantly related to performance.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 58
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CONSUM MARK
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT BEST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1962, STRATEGY STRUCTURE
[4]  
ANSOFF HI, 1967, HARVARD BUS REV, V45, P71
[5]  
Argyres N, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P395, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199605)17:5<395::AID-SMJ826>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-E
[7]   Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry [J].
Bierly, P ;
Chakrabarti, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :123-135
[8]  
Bourgeois L.J., 1983, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, P43
[9]  
Bourgeois L. T., 1981, Acad. Manag. Rev., V6, P29, DOI [10.2307/257138, DOI 10.2307/257138, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4287985]
[10]   Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification [J].
Breschi, S ;
Lissoni, F ;
Malerba, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :69-87