Growth factor practice patterns among pediatric oncologists: Results of a 1998 Pediatric Oncology Group survey

被引:7
作者
Parsons, SK
Mayer, DK
Alexander, SW
Xu, RH
Land, V
Laver, J
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Pediat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Biostat Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat,Div Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] POG Operat Off, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
hematopoietic growth factors; neutropenia; febrile neutropenia; pediatric oncology; practice guide lines; evidence-based medicine;
D O I
10.1097/00043426-200005000-00008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines on growth factor (GF) use recommend applying adult-derived guidelines in pediatric oncology. An ASCO survey of adult oncology GF use determined the preference for first degree prophylaxis (use of GF when febrile neutropenia [FN] is expected to be high in untreated patients), second-degree prophylaxis (administration of GF after a documented episode of FN on a previous cycle of chemotherapy), and intervention in the treatment of FN. Similar preferences have not been evaluated in pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to (1) characterize GF use in pediatric oncology; (2) correlate use patterns with demographic factors; and (3) compare the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and ASCO surveys. The ASCO survey was revised for use within pediatric oncology and was mailed to the physician membership of FOG; 341 were returned (85% completion rate). Comparisons were made with the ASCO survey. Most (76%) physicians said GF use was determined by protocol requirements and most (70%) patients were entered on FOG protocols. GF use as first-degree prophylaxis was selected 40% of the time, which was significantly greater than in adults; this was most influenced by anticipated duration of neutropenia (greater than or equal to 7 days). The severity of the initial clinical course (eg, neutropenia, infection) influenced use in second-degree prophylaxis; dose reduction alone was never selected. For FN, GF use was 45%, with lower preferences in uncomplicated FN (16%-38%) compared with complicated FN (66%). FOG respondents endorse greater use of GF for first and second-degree prophylaxis but less use in uncomplicated FN than do ASCO respondents. These patterns may reflect different strategies, including the role of chemotherapy, value of dose intensity, and perceived toxicity of regimens. Given these differences, adult-based guidelines may not be appropriate for pediatrics.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 241
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
A PHASE-I AND PHASE-II TRIAL OF DOSE-INTENSIFIED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND GM-CSF IN PEDIATRIC MALIGNANT BRAIN-TUMORS [J].
ABRAHAMSEN, TG ;
LANGE, BJ ;
PACKER, RJ ;
VENZON, DJ ;
ALLEN, JC ;
CRAIG, CE ;
PATRONAS, NJ ;
KATZ, DA ;
GOLDWEIN, JW ;
DELANEY, TF ;
REAMAN, GH ;
PERILONGO, G ;
PHILLIPS, PC ;
OLDFIELD, EH ;
POPLACK, DG ;
HOROWITZ, ME .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 1995, 17 (02) :134-139
[2]
[Anonymous], 1996, J CLIN ONCOL, V14, P1957
[3]
[Anonymous], 1994, J CLIN ONCOL, V12, P2471
[4]
Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: Comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines [J].
Bennett, CL ;
Weeks, JA ;
Somerfield, MR ;
Feinglass, J ;
Smith, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3676-3681
[5]
Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: The American Society of Clinical Oncology survey [J].
Bennett, CL ;
Smith, TJ ;
Weeks, JC ;
Bredt, AB ;
Feinglass, J ;
Fetting, JH ;
Hillner, BE ;
Somerfield, MR ;
Winn, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (09) :2511-2520
[6]
EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH CHEMOTHERAPY-RELATED LEUKOPENIA AND FEVER [J].
BIESMA, B ;
DEVRIES, EGE ;
WILLEMSE, PHB ;
SLUITER, WJ ;
POSTMUS, PE ;
LIMBURG, PC ;
STERN, AC ;
VELLENGA, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 26 (09) :932-936
[7]
Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy [J].
Bregni, M ;
Siena, S ;
DiNicola, M ;
Dodero, A ;
Peccatori, F ;
Ravagnani, F ;
Danesini, G ;
Laffranchi, A ;
Bonadonna, G ;
Gianni, AM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) :628-635
[8]
BURDACH SEG, 1995, CANCER, V76, P510, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950801)76:3<510::AID-CNCR2820760323>3.0.CO
[9]
2-W
[10]
CONCURRENT RHGM-CSF DOES NOT OFFSET MYELOSUPPRESSION FROM INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY - RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
CALDERWOOD, S ;
ROMEYER, F ;
BLANCHETTE, V ;
CHAN, H ;
DOYLE, J ;
GREENBERG, M ;
LORENZANA, A ;
MALKIN, D ;
SAUNDERS, F ;
WEITZMAN, S ;
ZIPURSKY, A ;
FREEDMAN, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :27-32