Analgesic efficacy of sustained release paracetamol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

被引:23
作者
Bacon, TH
Hole, JG
North, M
Burnett, I
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Surrey KT13 0DE, England
[2] Adcroft Surg, Trowbridge BA14 8QA, Wilts, England
[3] Profiad Ltd, Reading RG1 1NY, Berks, England
关键词
osteoarthritis; paracetamol; sustained release;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01603.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
aimZParacetamol is widely recommended as the initial treatment for pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA). A sustained release (SR) paracetamol formulation (Panadol Extend(TM)) was compared with standard immediate release (IR) paracetamol (Panadol(TM)) in patients with knee pain secondary to OA. The primary parameter for assessment of efficacy was patient-assessed global pain relief as determined on day 8 of the treatment period. A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study was conducted. Patients (n=403) were treated for 7 days with paracetamol 4 g day(-1) (SR paracetamol, two 665 mg tablets taken three times daily; IR paracetamol, two 500 mg tablets taken four times daily). Patients completed daily pain measurements and assessed global pain relief at the end of the study. Therapeutic noninferiority was defined on the basis of achieving statistical noninferiority for global pain relief. Results Analysis of the primary parameter for the intention to treat population showed that the difference in proportion of patients (SR-IR paracetamol) achieving a successful response on day 8 was -0.7%; 90% CI (-8.82%, 7.45%), P=0.890. For the per protocol population the difference in proportion was -3.0%; 90% CI (-11.61%, 5.66%), P=0.571. As the lower bound of the 90% CI for the treatment difference in each case was greater than the prespecified value (-15%), SR paracetamol was considered to be statistically noninferior to IR paracetamol in terms of pain relief. The treatments were not significantly different for any of the secondary parameters in either populations. Conclusions SR paracetamol taken three times daily was statistically and therapeutically noninferior to IR paracetamol taken four times daily in patients with knee pain due to OA. SR paracetamol may be more convenient for patients with chronic pain and has the potential to enhance compliance and therefore pain relief.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 636
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Altman RD, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P1905
[2]  
AMADIO P, 1983, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V34, P59
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Eur J Pain
[4]  
BACON TH, 2001, 22 ANN SCI M AUSTR P, P63
[5]   COMPARISON OF AN ANTIINFLAMMATORY DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AN ANALGESIC DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AND ACETAMINOPHEN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
BRADLEY, JD ;
BRANDT, KD ;
KATZ, BP ;
KALASINSKI, LA ;
RYAN, SI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (02) :87-91
[6]  
Brandt K D, 2000, Am J Ther, V7, P75, DOI 10.1097/00045391-200007020-00005
[7]   Beyond disability: measuring the social and personal consequences of osteoarthritis [J].
Carr, AJ .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (02) :230-238
[8]  
CHAN SY, 2001, Patent No. 0180834
[9]   Pain control with paracetamol from a sustained release formulation and a standard release formulation after third molar surgery: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Coulthard, P ;
Hill, CM ;
Frame, JW ;
Barry, H ;
Ridge, BD ;
Bacon, TH .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 191 (06) :319-324
[10]   Osteoarthritis pain and its treatment [J].
Creamer, P .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2000, 12 (05) :450-455