Stochastic Power Generation Unit Commitment in Electricity Markets: A Novel Formulation and a Comparison of Solution Methods

被引:61
作者
Cerisola, Santiago [1 ]
Baillo, Alvaro [2 ]
Fernandez-Lopez, Jose M. [2 ]
Ramos, Andres [1 ]
Gollmer, Ralf [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pontificia Comillas, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, IIT, ICAI, Madrid 28015, Spain
[2] Ciudad Grp Santander, Banco Santander, Madrid 28660, Spain
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Math, D-47048 Duisburg, Germany
关键词
MODEL; CONSTRAINTS; MANAGEMENT; ALGORITHM; SECURITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1080.0593
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
We propose a stochastic unit commitment model for a power generation company that takes part in an electricity spot market. The relevant feature of this model is its detailed representation of the spot market during a whole week, including seven day-ahead market sessions and the corresponding adjustment market sessions. The adjustment market sessions can be seen as an hour-ahead market mechanism. This representation takes into account the influence that the company's decisions exert on the market-clearing price by means of a residual demand curve for each market session. We introduce uncertainty in the form of several possible spot market outcomes for each day, which leads to a weekly scenario tree. The model also represents in detail the operation of the company's generation units. The model leads to large-scale mixed linear-integer problems that are hard to solve with commercial optimizers. This suggests the use of alternative solution methods. We test four solution approaches with a realistic numerical example in the context of the Spanish electricity spot market. The first is a direct solution with a commercial optimizer, which illustrates the mentioned limitations. The second is a standard Lagrangean relaxation algorithm. The third and fourth methods are two original variants of Benders decomposition for multistage stochastic integer programs. The first Benders decomposition algorithm builds approximations for the recourse function relaxing the integrality constraints of the subproblems. The second variant strengthens these cuts by performing one iteration of the Lagrangean of each subproblem. We analyze the advantages of these four methods and compare the results.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 46
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[2]
Optimal offer construction in electricity markets [J].
Anderson, EJ ;
Philpott, AB .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 27 (01) :82-100
[3]
Bundle methods in stochastic optimal power management:: A disaggregated approach using preconditioners [J].
Bacaud, L ;
Lemaréchal, C ;
Renaud, A ;
Sagastizábal, C .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 20 (03) :227-244
[4]
Optimal offering strategies for generation companies operating in electricity spot markets [J].
Baillo, A ;
Ventosa, M ;
Rivier, M ;
Ramos, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (02) :745-753
[5]
Baíllo A, 2001, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V36, P227
[6]
THE GENERALIZED UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM [J].
BALDICK, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1995, 10 (01) :465-475
[7]
Benders J., 1962, NUMER MATH, V4, P238, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10287-004-0020-Y, DOI 10.1007/BF01386316, 10.1007/BF01386316]
[8]
A MULTICUT ALGORITHM FOR 2-STAGE STOCHASTIC LINEAR-PROGRAMS [J].
BIRGE, JR ;
LOUVEAUX, FV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 34 (03) :384-392
[9]
Brooke A., 1996, GAMS USERS GUIDE
[10]
A medium-term integrated risk management model for a hydrothermal generation company [J].
Cabero, J ;
Baíllo, A ;
Cerisola, S ;
Ventosa, M ;
García-Alcalde, A ;
Perán, F ;
Relaño, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (03) :1379-1388