Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task

被引:288
作者
Hinds, PJ [1 ]
Roberts, TL
Jones, H
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Aerosp Robot Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2004年 / 19卷 / 1-2期
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_7
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The use of autonomous, mobile professional service robots in diverse workplaces is expected to grow substantially over the next decade. These robots often will work side by side with people, collaborating with employees on tasks. Some roboticists have argued that, in these cases, people will collaborate more naturally and easily with humanoid robots as compared with machine-like robots. It is also speculated that people will rely. on and share responsibility more readily with robots that are in a position of authority. This study sought to clarify the effects of robot appearance and relative status on human-robot collaboration by investigating the extent to which people relied on and ceded responsibility to a robot coworker. In this study, a 3 x 3 experiment was conducted with human likeness (human, human-like robot, and machine-like robot) and status (subordinate, peer, and supervisor) as dimensions. As far as we know, this study is one of the first experiments examining how people respond to robotic coworkers. As such, this study attempts to design a robust and transferable sorting and assembly task that capitalizes on the types of tasks robots are expected to do and is embedded in a realistic scenario in which the participant and confederate are interdependent. The results show that participants retained more responsibility for the successful completion of the task when working with a machine-like as compared with a humanoid robot, especially when the machine-like robot was subordinate. These findings suggest that humanoid robots may be appropriate for settings in which people have to delegate responsibility to these robots or when the task is too demanding for people to do, and when complacency is not a major concern. Machine-like robots, however, may be more appropriate when robots are expected to be unreliable, are less well-equipped for the task than people are, or in other situations in which personal responsibility should be emphasized.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 181
页数:31
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ambrose R., 2001, P IEEE 2001 INT C HU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CMURITR0229
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HUM FAC TRANSP
[5]  
BREAZEAL C, 1999, P AG 99 WORKSH EM BA
[6]  
Breazeal C., 1999, 1999 IEEE RSJ INT C
[7]  
Brooks R, 2002, COMMUN ACM, V45, P33, DOI 10.1145/504729.504751
[8]  
Brooks R., 2002, HUMANOID ROBOTICS GR
[9]   Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise [J].
Burke, JL ;
Murphy, RR ;
Coovert, MD ;
Riddle, DL .
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2004, 19 (1-2) :85-116
[10]  
DAUTENHAHN K, 1999, P 3 INT COGN TECHN C