Separate attentional resources for vision and audition

被引:110
作者
Alais, D
Morrone, C
Burr, D
机构
[1] CNR, Ist Neurosci, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Psicol, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Dipartimento Psicol, I-50125 Florence, Italy
关键词
attention; vision; audition;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2005.3420
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current models of attention, typically claim that vision and audition are limited by a common attentional resource which means that visual performance should be adversely affected by a concurrent auditory task and vice versa. Here, we test this implication by measuring auditory (pitch) and visual (contrast) thresholds in conjunction with cross-modal secondary tasks and find that no such interference occurs. Visual contrast discrimination thresholds were unaffected by a concurrent chord or pitch discrimination, and pitch-discrimination thresholds were virtually unaffected by a concurrent visual search or contrast discrimination task. However, if the dual tasks were presented within the same modality, thresholds were raised by a factor of between two (for visual discrimination) and four (for auditory discrimination). These results suggest that at least for low-level tasks such as discriminations of pitch and contrast, each sensory modality is under separate attentional control, rather than being limited by a supramodal attentional resource. This has implications for current theories of attention as well as for the use of multi-sensory media for efficient informational transmission.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1345
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   DIVISION OF ATTENTION - DISPROOF OF SINGLE CHANNEL HYPOTHESIS [J].
ALLPORT, DA ;
ANTONIS, B ;
REYNOLDS, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (MAY) :225-&
[2]   Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of target-distractor similarity [J].
Arnell, KM ;
Jenkins, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (07) :1147-1161
[3]   The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations [J].
Arnell, KM ;
Jolicoeur, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 25 (03) :630-648
[4]   Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities:: an event-related potential study [J].
Beer, AL ;
Röder, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 21 (04) :1116-1130
[5]   Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals [J].
Bonnel, AM ;
Hafter, ER .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1998, 60 (02) :179-190
[6]   Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination [J].
Boynton, GM ;
Demb, JB ;
Glover, GH ;
Heeger, DJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (02) :257-269
[7]   A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention [J].
Brefczynski, JA ;
DeYoe, EA .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (04) :370-374
[8]   INTERACTION OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL SENSORY MODALITIES [J].
BROWN, AE ;
HOPKINS, HK .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1967, 41 (01) :1-&
[9]   Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex [J].
Calvert, GA ;
Campbell, R ;
Brammer, MJ .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (11) :649-657
[10]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215