A multiple attributes decision making method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment

被引:53
作者
Fan, Zhi-Ping [1 ]
Feng, Bo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] S China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Dept Decis Sci, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Individual attributes; Collaborative attributes; Linguistic variable; Fuzzy number; TOPSIS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; INFORMATION; SELECTION; ORGANIZATIONS; ALLIANCES; PARTNER; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2009.06.037
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems with both individual attribute data of a single alternative and collaborative attribute data of pairwise alternatives exist in the real world, they have seldom been a focus of research. This paper proposes a MADM method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment, in which experts use linguistic variables to express their opinions. In the method, first, the evaluation matrix of individual attributes date and the judgment matrix of collaborative attributes data are constructed. Then, the central dominance of one alternative outranking other all alternatives is defined for aggregating the collaborative data. From this, an integrated decision matrix incorporating individual and collaborative attribute data is constructed. Further, based on an extended TOPSIS, the fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and the fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) are determined, and the relative closeness of each alternative to the FPIS and FNIS is calculated to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. Finally, two examples are used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3603 / 3618
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic
[3]   INFORMATION ASYMMETRY, ADVERSE SELECTION AND JOINT-VENTURES - THEORY AND EVIDENCE [J].
BALAKRISHNAN, S ;
KOZA, MP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1993, 20 (01) :99-117
[4]  
BONISSONE P, 1986, UNCERTAINTY ARTIFICI
[5]   Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain [J].
Bueyuekoezkan, Guelcin ;
Feyzioglu, Orhan ;
Nebol, Erdal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (01) :148-158
[6]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[7]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[8]   A MULTIPLE-CRITERIA COMPOSITE INDEX MODEL FOR QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DATA [J].
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 78 (03) :367-379
[9]   Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks [J].
Cowan, Robin ;
Jonard, Nicolas ;
Zimmermann, Jean-Benoit .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (07) :1051-1067
[10]   Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making [J].
Delgado, M ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Martinez, L .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1998, 107 (1-4) :177-194