Structure of the S1S2 glutamate binding domain of GluR3

被引:40
作者
Ahmed, Ahmed H. [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Sondermann, Holger [1 ]
Oswald, Robert E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Mol Med, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
kainate; glutamate receptor; AMPA receptor; willardiine; receptor structure; crystallography; GluR3; GluR2; LIGAND-BINDING; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES; AMPA RECEPTOR; PARTIAL AGONISM; ION CHANNELS; DOMOIC ACID; CORE; KAINATE; DESENSITIZATION; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1002/prot.22274
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
070307 [化学生物学]; 071010 [生物化学与分子生物学];
摘要
Glutamate receptors are the most prevalent excitatory neurotransmitter receptors in the vertebrate central nervous system. Determining the structural differences between the binding sites of different subtypes is crucial to our understanding of neuronal circuits and to the development of subtype specific drugs. The structures of the binding domain (S1S2) of the GluR3 (flip) AMPA receptor subunit bound to glutamate and AMPA and the GluR2 (flop) subunit bound to glutamate were determined by X-ray crystallography to 1.9, 2.1, and 1.55 angstrom, respectively. Overall, the structure of GluR3 (flip) S1S2 is very similar to GluR2 (flop) S1S2 (backbone RMSD of 0.30 +/- 0.05 for glutamate-bound and 0.26 +/- 0.01 for AMPA-bound). The differences in the flip and flop isoforms are subtle and largely arise from one hydrogen bond across the dimer interface and associated water molecules. Comparison of the binding affinity for various agonists and partial agonists suggest that the S1S2 domains of GluR2 and GluR3 show only small differences in affinity unlike what is found for the intact receptors (with the exception of one ligand, Cl-HIBO, which has a 10-fold difference in affinity for GluR2 vs. GluR3).
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 637
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
PHENIX:: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination [J].
Adams, PD ;
Grosse-Kunstleve, RW ;
Hung, LW ;
Ioerger, TR ;
McCoy, AJ ;
Moriarty, NW ;
Read, RJ ;
Sacchettini, JC ;
Sauter, NK ;
Terwilliger, TC .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 58 :1948-1954
[2]
Dynamics of the S1S2 glutamate binding domain of GluR2 measured using 19F NMR spectroscopy [J].
Ahmed, H. Ahmed ;
Loh, Adrienne P. ;
Jane, David E. ;
Oswald, Robert E. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 282 (17) :12773-12784
[3]
Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive glutamate receptor: Crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core [J].
Armstrong, N ;
Gouaux, E .
NEURON, 2000, 28 (01) :165-181
[4]
Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate [J].
Armstrong, N ;
Sun, Y ;
Chen, GQ ;
Gouaux, E .
NATURE, 1998, 395 (6705) :913-917
[5]
Ionotropic glutamate receptors - Their possible role in the expression of hippocampal synaptic plasticity [J].
Asztely, F ;
Gustafsson, B .
MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY, 1996, 12 (01) :1-11
[6]
Identification of amino acid residues in GluR1 responsible for ligand binding and desensitization [J].
Banke, TG ;
Greenwood, JR ;
Christensen, JK ;
Liljefors, T ;
Traynelis, SF ;
Schousboe, A ;
Pickering, DS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (09) :3052-3062
[7]
Design, synthesis, and pharmacology of a highly subtype-selective GluR1/2 agonist, (RS)-2-amino-3-(4-chloro-3-hydroxy-5-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (Cl-HIBO) [J].
Bjerrum, EJ ;
Kristensen, AS ;
Pickering, DS ;
Greenwood, JR ;
Nielsen, B ;
Liljefors, T ;
Schousboe, A ;
Bräuner-Osborne, H ;
Madsen, U .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 46 (11) :2246-2249
[8]
Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system [J].
Brunger, Axel T. .
NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2007, 2 (11) :2728-2733
[9]
Overexpression of a glutamate receptor (GluR2) ligand binding domain in Escherichia coli: Application of a novel protein folding screen [J].
Chen, GQ ;
Gouaux, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (25) :13431-13436
[10]
Agonist discrimination between AMPA receptor subtypes [J].
Coquelle, T ;
Christensen, JK ;
Banke, TG ;
Madsen, U ;
Schousboe, A ;
Pickering, DS .
NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (12) :2643-2648