The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP

被引:341
作者
Bateman, Ian J. [1 ]
Day, Brett H. [1 ]
Georgiou, Stavros [1 ]
Lake, Iain [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, CSERGE, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
valuation; aggregation; total willingness to pay; distance decay; selection bias; contingent valuation; water quality; wetlands; rivers;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 [生物信息与计算生物学]; 0713 [生态学];
摘要
We review the literature regarding the aggregation of benefit value estimates for nonmarket goods. Two case studies are presented through which we develop an approach to aggregation which applies the spatial analytic capabilities of a geographical information system to combine geo-referenced physical, census and survey data to estimate a spatially sensitive valuation function. These case studies show that the common reliance upon political rather than economic jurisdictions and the use of sample mean values within the aggregation process are liable to lead to significant errors in resultant values. We also highlight the fact that for resources with use values then we should expect overall values to reduce with increasing distance from such sites, but that changes in the choice of welfare measure will determine whether such 'distance decay' is to be expected within values stated by those who are presently non-users. The paper concludes by providing recommendations for future improvements to the methodology. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 460
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 3 RES ASS COMM
[2]
Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: A case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements [J].
Bateman, I. J. ;
Cole, M. A. ;
Georgiou, S. ;
Hadley, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (03) :221-231
[3]
Bateman I.J., 2005, CSERGE WORKING PAPER
[4]
Non-users' willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Langford, IH .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1997, 31 (06) :571-582
[5]
On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Cole, M ;
Cooper, P ;
Georgiou, S ;
Hadley, D ;
Poe, GL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (01) :71-93
[6]
Bateman IJ, 2005, AQUAT SCI, V67, P274, DOI 10.1007/s00027-004-0744-3
[7]
Bateman IJ, 2000, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V43, P291, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640560010720
[8]
Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market [J].
Berry, S ;
Levinsohn, J ;
Pakes, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (01) :68-105
[9]
BISHOP RC, 1985, EC VALUE ILLINOIS BE
[10]
Carson R.T., 1999, INCENTIVE INFORM PRO