Rejecting renewables: The socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States

被引:231
作者
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Ctr Asia & Globalisat, Energy Governance Program, Singapore 117548, Singapore
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Renewable energy; Renewable electricity; Renewable power; ENERGY-CRISIS; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.073
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
If renewable power systems deliver such impressive benefits, why do they still provide only 3 percent of national electricity generation in the United States? As an answer, this article demonstrates that the impediments to renewable power are socio-technical, a term that encompasses the technological, social, political, regulatory, and cultural aspects of electricity supply and use. Extensive interviews of public utility commissioners, utility managers, system operators, manufacturers, researchers, business owners, and ordinary consumers reveal that it is these socio-technical barriers that often explain why wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and hydroelectric power sources are not embraced. Utility operators reject renewable resources because they are trained to think only in terms of big, conventional power plants. Consumers practically ignore renewable power systems because they are not given accurate price signals about electricity consumption. Intentional market distortions (such as subsidies), and unintentional market distortions (such as split incentives) prevent consumers from becoming fully invested in their electricity choices. As a result, newer and cleaner technologies that may offer social and environmental benefits but are not consistent with the dominant paradigm of the electricity industry continue to face comparative rejection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4500 / 4513
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Alderfer B., 2000, NRELSR20028053
[2]  
Allen A, 2002, ENERGY LAW J, V23, P505
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ELECT J, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2008.05.009
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, POWER ACTION BELIEF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1920, PRINCIPLES EC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ELECT AM SOCIAL MEAN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1924, MACMILLAN
[8]   PREFERRED SOLUTIONS TO THE ENERGY-CRISIS AS A FUNCTION OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
BELK, R ;
PAINTER, J ;
SEMENIK, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1981, 8 (03) :306-312
[9]   CONSUMERS PREFERENCES FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY-CONSERVATION POLICIES - A TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS [J].
BENNETT, PD ;
MOORE, NK .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1981, 8 (03) :313-321
[10]   POSTDECISION CHANGES IN THE DESIRABILITY OF ALTERNATIVES [J].
BREHM, JW .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 52 (03) :384-389