Energy feature of a multi-flow column flotation process

被引:6
作者
Cheng, Gan [1 ]
Yu, Yuexian [2 ]
Ma, Liqiang [2 ]
Xia, Wencheng [3 ]
Xu, Hongxiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Polytech Univ, Coll Chem & Chem, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Sch Chem & Environm Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING | 2017年 / 53卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
flotation column; turbulent kinetic energy; turbulent dissipation rate; bubble; DISSIPATION; FLOW;
D O I
10.5277/ppmp170245
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070305 [高分子化学与物理];
摘要
A cyclonic-static micro-bubble flotation column (FCSMC) has been widely used in mineral separation. FCSMC includes countercurrent, cyclone and jet flow mineralization zones in a single column. In this study, the energy feature of the three different zones was compared. The turbulent flow was evaluated in terms of the turbulent kinetic energy (k) and the turbulent dissipation rate (e). An appropriate computing model was determined by comparing the flow field value measured by PIV with the results of the Fluent numerical simulation. Jet flow separation exhibited the maximum k and e values among the three columns, whereas counter-current separation displayed the minimum values. The high circulating volumetric flowrate means great energy input and turbulent intensity. The higher turbulent dissipation rate, the smaller the bubble is. The better performance of the FCSMC was mainly attributed to the multiple mineralization steps. The floatability of mineral particles gradually decreases with an increase in flotation time, the mineralization energy gradually increased to overcome the decrease in mineral floatability. By contrast, the countercurrent was beneficial for recovering the coarse particles, and the jet flow was beneficial for recovering the fine particles.
引用
收藏
页码:1264 / 1284
页数:21
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1941, P USSR ACAD SCI
[2]
[Anonymous], 1975, TURBULENCE
[3]
Ballantyne G., 2012, 26 INT MIN PROC C IM, P1223
[4]
Bubble-Distribution Measurement in a Flotation Column [J].
Cheng, G. ;
Shi, C. L. ;
Liu, J. T. ;
Yan, X. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2016, 36 (05) :241-250
[5]
Study on Energy Consumption in Fine Coal Flotation [J].
Cheng, G. ;
Liu, J. T. ;
Ma, L. Q. ;
Cao, Y. J. ;
Li, J. H. ;
Huang, G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2014, 34 (01) :38-48
[6]
Cheng G., 2015, J. Chem. Pharmaceut. Res, V7, P540
[7]
GORAIN B. K., 2012, 26 INT MIN PROC C NE, P1657
[8]
Validation of an energy-size relationship obtained from a similarity solution to the batch grinding equation [J].
Gupta, V. K. .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 249 :396-402
[9]
Fluctuations in the popularity and usage of flotation columns - An overview [J].
Harbort, Greg ;
Clarke, Danica .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2017, 100 :17-30
[10]
Determination of local velocity, energy dissipation and phase fraction with LIF- and PIV-measurement in a Kuhni miniplant extraction column [J].
Hlawitschka, M. W. ;
Bart, H-J .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2012, 69 (01) :138-145