First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN):: a report on 120 cases

被引:156
作者
Lenich, A.
Mayr, E.
Rueter, A.
Moeckl, Ch.
Fuechtmeier, B.
机构
[1] Klinikum Augsburg, Dept Trauma Surg, D-86156 Augsburg, Germany
[2] Klinikum Univ Regensburg, Dept Trauma Surg, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
fracture; femur; trochanteric femur nail; TFN; intramedullar osteosynthesis;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A complication rate between 4-18% for the conventional osteosynthesis of the proximal femur fracture continues to be unacceptable even if increasing age and co-morbidity of patients are taken into account. Therefore, new intramedullary techniques are under development, and we here report our results with the novel trochanteric fixation nail (TFN). During the study period (March 2003-February 2004) all patients with a trochanteric fracture Type A1-A3 (AO/ASIF classification) were eligible for the study, and 120 patients (mean age 81 years, range 47-100; male/female 1:4) subsequently enrolled. Most frequent was the (according to the AO classification) A.2.1. type of fracture (n=39) and the A.2.2. fracture (n= 39). Operation time from cut to stitch was 45 mins (minimal 21/maximal 194). Thirty-seven (31%) postoperative X-rays were classified as very good, 60 (50%) as good, 18 (15%) as satisfying and five (4%) as bad post-reposition results according to the Garden Alignment Index. The clinical results were documented by the time of hospital stay, postoperative mobilization and time of rehabilitation compared to the old social status. Time to hospital discharge was 17 days (9 /25). Overall complication rate was 7.5% (9 patients) with 5.8% [7] local wound infection; 1.6% [2] cutting out of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head. We had three (2.5%) hospital deaths in our patient group. We conclude that TFN is a safe and reliable technique. Compared with techniques like PFN and Gamma-nail, clinical results are excellent with less complications.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 712
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture [J].
Al-yassari, G ;
Langstaff, RJ ;
Jones, JWM ;
Al-Lami, M .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (05) :395-399
[2]
Baumgaertner MR, 1996, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V78, P1058
[3]
A 10-YEAR ANALYSIS OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR [J].
CLEVELAND, M ;
BOSWORTH, DM ;
THOMPSON, FR ;
WILSON, HJ ;
ISHIZUKA, T .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1959, 41 (08) :1399-1408
[4]
FRIEDL W, 1994, CHIRURG, V65, P953
[5]
FRIEDL W, 1987, CHIRURG, V58, P106
[6]
FRIEDL W, 1990, UNFALLCHIRURG, V93, P364
[7]
Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures [J].
Fritz, T ;
Hiersemann, K ;
Krieglstein, C ;
Friedl, W .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1999, 119 (1-2) :1-6
[8]
HANDOLL HH, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[9]
The standard Gamma nail:: A critical analysis of 1,000 cases [J].
Kukla, C ;
Heinz, T ;
Gaebler, C ;
Heinze, G ;
Vécsei, V .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 51 (01) :77-83
[10]
Hip replacement after failed internal fixation in patients with proximal femur fracture -: a simple procedure? [J].
Lenich, A ;
Mayr, E ;
Rüter, A .
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2002, 127 (06) :503-506