Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results

被引:74
作者
Klon, AE [1 ]
Glick, M [1 ]
Thoma, M [1 ]
Acklin, P [1 ]
Davies, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Inst Biomed Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jm030363k
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The technology underpinning high-throughput docking (HTD) has developed over the past few years to where it has become a vital tool in modern drug discovery. Although the performance of various docking algorithms is adequate, the ability to accurately and consistently rank compounds using a scoring function remains problematic. We show that by employing a simple machine learning method (naive Bayes) it is possible to significantly overcome this deficiency. Compounds from the Available Chemical Directory (ACD), along with known active compounds, were docked into two protein targets using three software packages. In cases where HTD alone was able to show some enrichment, the application of naive Bayes was able to improve upon the enrichment. The application of this methodology to enrich HTD results can be carried out without a priori knowledge of the activity of compounds and results in superior enrichment of known actives compared to the use of scoring methods alone.
引用
收藏
页码:2743 / 2749
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   High-throughput docking for lead generation [J].
Abagyan, R ;
Totrov, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (04) :375-382
[2]   Potent inhibition of protein-tyrosine phosphatase by phosphotyrosine-mimic containing cyclic peptides [J].
Akamatsu, M ;
Roller, PP ;
Chen, L ;
Zhang, ZY ;
Ye, B ;
Burke, TR .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 5 (01) :157-163
[3]  
ANDERSEN HS, 2001, Patent No. 0100451
[4]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Battistuz, T ;
Bhat, TN ;
Bluhm, WF ;
Bourne, PE ;
Burkhardt, K ;
Iype, L ;
Jain, S ;
Fagan, P ;
Marvin, J ;
Padilla, D ;
Ravichandran, V ;
Schneider, B ;
Thanki, N ;
Weissig, H ;
Westbrook, JD ;
Zardecki, C .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 58 :899-907
[5]   Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations [J].
Bissantz, C ;
Folkers, G ;
Rognan, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) :4759-4767
[6]   Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins [J].
Charifson, PS ;
Corkery, JJ ;
Murcko, MA ;
Walters, WP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) :5100-5109
[7]   Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions [J].
Clark, RD ;
Strizhev, A ;
Leonard, JM ;
Blake, JF ;
Matthew, JB .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2002, 20 (04) :281-295
[8]   DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases [J].
Ewing, TJA ;
Makino, S ;
Skillman, AG ;
Kuntz, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) :411-428
[9]  
Friedman J., 2001, The elements of statistical learning, V1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5
[10]   ITERATIVE PARTIAL EQUALIZATION OF ORBITAL ELECTRONEGATIVITY - A RAPID ACCESS TO ATOMIC CHARGES [J].
GASTEIGER, J ;
MARSILI, M .
TETRAHEDRON, 1980, 36 (22) :3219-3228