A constant-head well permeameter method for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity above an impermeable layer

被引:19
作者
Hayashi, M [1 ]
Quinton, WL
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geol & Geophys, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Geog, Burnaby, BC V2X 9S6, Canada
关键词
Guelph permeameter; hydraulic conductivity; forest hydrology; permafrost; peat;
D O I
10.4141/S03-064
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Hayashi, M. and Quinton, W. L. 2004. A constant-head well permeameter method for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity above an impermeable layer. Can. J. Soil Sci. 84: 255-264. Hydrologic understanding of mountainous and northern regions of Canada is poor owing to the lack of critical field data such as hydraulic conductivity. A portable field instrument, the Guelph permeameter (GP), is a promising tool for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in remote watersheds inaccessible by motorized vehicles. In order to extend the applicability of the GP method to relatively thin soils underlain by impermeable bedrock or permafrost, a new set of shape factors was determined by numerical simulation. The new shape factors gave accurate values of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity when tested in the laboratory. The impermeable layer causes flow around the auger hole to be primarily horizontal. Therefore, the GP method measures a predominantly horizontal field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in these thin soils. The measured conductivity represents a weighted average of the soil surrounding the submerged surface of the auger hole. In layered soil, the weight is greater for the layers close to the bottom of the hole than for those close to the top.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 264
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A comparison of methods to determine measurement support volumes [J].
Beckie, R .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (04) :925-936
[2]   Anisotropy and depth-related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a bog peat. I: laboratory measurements [J].
Beckwith, CW ;
Baird, AJ ;
Heathwaite, AL .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2003, 17 (01) :89-101
[3]  
BOUWER H, 1974, AGRONOMY, V17, P611
[4]   A GENERAL MASS-CONSERVATIVE NUMERICAL-SOLUTION FOR THE UNSATURATED FLOW EQUATION [J].
CELIA, MA ;
BOULOUTAS, ET ;
ZARBA, RL .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1990, 26 (07) :1483-1496
[5]  
Dane J.H., 2002, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods
[6]   METHODS FOR ANALYZING CONSTANT-HEAD WELL PERMEAMETER DATA [J].
ELRICK, DE ;
REYNOLDS, WD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (01) :320-323
[7]  
Flint L. E., 2002, METHODS SOIL ANAL 4, P241, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4.C11
[8]  
GARDNER W. R., 1958, SOIL SCI, V85, P228, DOI 10.1097/00010694-195804000-00006
[9]   SLUG TESTS IN UNCONFINED FORMATIONS - AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BOUWER AND RICE TECHNIQUE [J].
HYDER, Z ;
BUTLER, JJ .
GROUND WATER, 1995, 33 (01) :16-22
[10]  
*NAT RES COUNC CAN, 1988, 142 NAT RES COUNC AS