Validation of the Functional Independence Scale

被引:35
作者
Martinez-Martin, Pablo [1 ]
Fernandez-Mayoralas, Gloria [2 ]
Frades-Payo, Belen [1 ]
Rojo-Perez, Fermina [2 ]
Petidier, Roberto [3 ]
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Vicente [2 ]
Forjaz, Maria J. [4 ]
Prieto-Flares, Maria Eugenia [2 ]
de Pedro Cuesta, Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Nacl Epidemiol, Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, Ctr Ciencias Humans & Sociales, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Getafe, Serv Geriatria, Madrid, Spain
[4] Escuela Nacl Sanidad, Inst Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Functional Independence Scale; The elderly; Community dwelling; Hospital outpatients; Validation; MENTAL STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATUS; POPULATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.06.007
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective: To assess the psychometric quality of an instrument designed to measure functional independence (Functional Independence Scale [FIS]) in several activities of daily living domains and to be applied by trained non-health-related interviewers. The study was carried out in the autonomous region of Madrid in community-dwelling elders. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional validation study. In addition to the FIS, Pfeiffer's questionnaire, the Depression Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Comorbidity Index, the Barthel Index, and EQ-5D were used. These measures were cross-sectionally applied to community-dwelling elders (n = 500) and outpatients in a general hospital (n = 100) aged :>= 65 years. The following FIS psychometric attributes were analyzed: acceptability, scaling assumptions, internal consistency, construct validity, and precision. Results: A fully computable FIS total score was obtained in 94.3% of the subjects. A ceiling effect (60.65%). but no floor effect (0.22%) was evident in the community-dwelling elders. No floor or ceiling effects were detected in the hospital sample. Scaling assumptions and internal consistency were satisfactory (item-total correlations: 0.57-0.91; Cronbach's alpha: 0.94). Factor analysis identified three factors that explained 74.3% of the variance. Indexes of convergent, internal, and known-groups validity were satisfactory. The scale's precision, determined by the standard error of measurement (2.49; 95%CI = 4.88), was also satisfactory. Conclusion: The FIS is an easy-to-use instrument with appropriate metric attributes. This scale can be usefully applied in broad samples of non-institutionalized elders by non-health related personnel. (c) 2008 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]
[Anonymous], 2001, CLAS INT FUNC DISC S
[3]
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
[4]
Badia X, 1999, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V112, P79
[5]
A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[6]
Bowling A., 1997, MEASURING HLTH REV Q, V2nd
[7]
Bowling A., 2005, Ageing well: Quality of life in old age
[8]
CAMPOS LB, 1994, REV SANID HIG PUBL, V68, P121
[9]
Cid-Ruzafa J, 1997, Rev Esp Salud Publica, V71, P127, DOI 10.1590/S1135-57271997000200004
[10]
de la Iglesia JM, 2001, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V117, P129