Colonization rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape

被引:114
作者
van Nouhuys, S [1 ]
Hanski, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Systemat & Ecol, Metab Res Grp, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
competition; Cotesia; dispersal distance; Melitaea cinxia; metapopulation; parasitoid dispersal;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00627.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. We describe the pattern of colonization of suitable, but currently empty, habitat by a host butterfly and two specialist parasitoids living in a highly fragmented landscape. 2. Using survey data collected over 8 years, field sampling and small-scale experiments we show that the ability of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) to colonize new habitat is intermediate between that of its two larval primary parasitoids. 3. The butterfly forms a classic metapopulation, which the parasitoid Hyposoter horticola experiences as a single patchily distributed host population because of its high rate of dispersal and long colonization distances. In contrast, most of the local butterfly populations are presently inaccessible to the parasitoid Cotesia melitaearum, which has a limited dispersal range and therefore persists only in tightly clustered networks of host populations. 4. At the regional scale, the butterfly may escape C. melitaearum by colonizing empty habitat, but host dispersal does not limit parasitism by H. horticola, which consequently must be limited by local interaction. 5. The parasitoid H. horticola mostly avoids direct competition with C. melitaearum because the majority of H. horticola populations are outside the range of dispersal by current C. melitaearum populations. In contrast, all C. melitaearum populations experience competition with H. horticola.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 650
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Allison PD, 1995, Survival analysis using sas: A practical guide, V2nd
[2]   Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: Local vs. spatial mechanisms [J].
Amarasekare, P .
ECOLOGY, 2000, 81 (05) :1286-1296
[3]   LONG-DISTANCE DISPERSAL BY A PARASITOID (ANAGRUS-DELICATUS, MYMARIDAE) AND ITS HOST [J].
ANTOLIN, MF ;
STRONG, DR .
OECOLOGIA, 1987, 73 (02) :288-292
[4]  
BENGTSSON J, 1991, METAPOPULATION DYNAM, P219
[5]   Mobile parasitoids may restrict the spatial spread of an insect outbreak [J].
Brodmann, PA ;
Wilcox, CV ;
Harrison, S .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 66 (01) :65-72
[6]   THE SPATIAL DYNAMICS OF HOST PARASITOID SYSTEMS [J].
COMINS, HN ;
HASSELL, MP ;
MAY, RM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 61 (03) :735-748
[7]   Persistence of multispecies host-parasitoid interactions in spatially distributed models with local dispersal [J].
Comins, HN ;
Hassell, MP .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 183 (01) :19-28
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]   Stem-boring insects of fragmented Calamagrostis habitats: herbivore-parasitoid community structure and the unpredictability of grass shoot abundance [J].
Dubbert, M ;
Tscharntke, T ;
Vidal, S .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1998, 23 (03) :271-280
[10]  
Godfray H.C.J., 1994, pi