Rabbit calvarial wound healing by means of seeded Caprotite® scaffolds

被引:27
作者
Bidic, SMS
Calvert, JW
Marra, K
Kumta, P
Campbell, P
Mitchell, R
Wigginton, W
Hollinger, JO
Weiss, L
Mooney, MP
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Biomed Hlth Engn & Biol Sci & Bone Tissue Engn Ct, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Robot, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
caprotite((R)); calvaria; rabbits; scaffolds; bone cells;
D O I
10.1177/154405910308200211
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Autologous bone is the most successful bone-grafting material; however, limited supply and donor site morbidity are problematic. Synthetic bone substitutes are effective, but healing is slow and unpredictable. Osseous wound healing may be enhanced if bone substitutes are combined with autologous bone marrow cells. To test this hypothesis, we created 40 calvarial defects in 20 12-week-old New Zealand White rabbits, divided into four groups: (1) unrepaired controls, (2) autologous bone grafts, (3) unseeded Caprotite(R) (a polymer-ceramic composite) grafts, and (4) Caprotite(R) grafts seeded with autologous bone marrow stromal cells. CT scans were obtained at 0, 6, and 12 weeks post-operatively, and defects were harvested for histology. Defects repaired with autologous bone had significantly (p < 0.05) more bone than the other three groups, although seeded Caprotite(R) defects showed different wound-healing sequelae. Results suggest that seeded Caprotite(R) scaffolds did not significantly enhance osseous defect healing compared with controls.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 135
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Localized, direct plasmid gene delivery in vivo:: prolonged therapy results in reproducible tissue regeneration [J].
Bonadio, J ;
Smiley, E ;
Patil, P ;
Goldstein, S .
NATURE MEDICINE, 1999, 5 (07) :753-759
[2]  
Calvert JW, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V52, P279, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(200011)52:2<279::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-8
[4]   Demineralized bone matrix as a biological scaffold for bone repair [J].
Chakkalakal, DA ;
Strates, BS ;
Garvin, KL ;
Novak, JR ;
Fritz, ED ;
Mollner, TJ ;
McGuire, MH .
TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2001, 7 (02) :161-177
[5]  
de Bruijn J D, 1999, Adv Dent Res, V13, P74
[6]  
Einhorn T A, 2001, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V9, P157
[7]   Effect of osteoblastic culture conditions on the structure of poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foam scaffolds [J].
Goldstein, AS ;
Zhu, GM ;
Morris, GE ;
Meszlenyi, RK ;
Mikos, AG .
TISSUE ENGINEERING, 1999, 5 (05) :421-433
[8]  
Hollinger J O, 1990, J Craniofac Surg, V1, P60, DOI 10.1097/00001665-199001000-00011
[9]   Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues - state of the art and future perspectives [J].
Hutmacher, DW .
JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION, 2001, 12 (01) :107-124
[10]  
Ignatius AA, 2001, J BIOMED MATER RES, V57, P126, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(200110)57:1<126::AID-JBM1151>3.0.CO