Secondhand tobacco smoke in public places in Latin America, 2002-2003

被引:94
作者
Navas-Acien, A
Peruga, A
Breysse, P
Zavaleta, A
Blanco-Marquizo, A
Pitarque, R
Acuña, M
Jiménez-Reyes, K
Colombo, VL
Gamarra, G
Stillman, FA
Samet, J
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Global Tobacco Control, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Pan Amer Hlth Org, Washington, DC USA
[5] Univ Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Dept Biochem Mol Biol & Pharmacol, Lima, Peru
[6] CEDRO, Lima, Peru
[7] Intendencia Municipal, Montevideo, Uruguay
[8] Minist Hlth, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[9] Minist Salud, Tobacco Unit, Santiago, Chile
[10] IAFA, San Jose, Costa Rica
[11] INCA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[12] Minist Hlth, Tobacco Unit, Asuncion, Paraguay
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 291卷 / 22期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.291.22.2741
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The success of measures to restrict smoking in indoor environments and the intensity of enforcement vary among countries around the world. In 2001, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) launched the Smoke-Free Americas Initiative to build capacity to achieve smoke-free environments in Latin America and the Caribbean. Objective To assess secondhand smoke concentrations in public places in the capital cities of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay in conjunction with the Smoke-Free Americas Initiative. Design and Setting Multicountry assessment of vapor-phase nicotine concentrations using a common protocol in all 7 Latin American countries. A total of 633 sampling devices were placed for 7 to 14 days in 1 hospital, 2 secondary schools, 1 city government building, 1 airport (2 in Argentina), and restaurants and bars in each country. Main Outcome Measure Concentrations of airborne nicotine. Results Airborne nicotine was detected in most (94%) of the locations surveyed. By country, Argentina and Uruguay had the highest median concentrations in most environments (eg, in hospitals: 1.33 [interquartile range {IQR), 0.51-3.12] mug/m(3) and 0.8 [IQR, 0.30-1.69] mug/m(3), respectively). Overall, bars and restaurants had the highest median concentrations (3.65 [IQR, 1.55-5.121 mug/m(3) and 1.24 [IQR, 0.41-2.48] mug/m(3), respectively). Nicotine concentrations were also found in a number of key, sentinel buildings, including 95% (155/163) of hospital samples (in the physicians' and nurses' stations the median was 0.27 [IQR, 0.02-1.94] mug/m(3)), schools, government buildings, and/or airports in most countries. Conclusions The finding of airborne nicotine in critical locations in Latin America provides a basis for enforcing smoke-free initiatives and for strengthening the protection of the public from unwanted exposure to secondhand smoke.
引用
收藏
页码:2741 / 2745
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AGUINAGABIALOUS S, 2002, PROFITS PEOPLE TOBAC
[2]   Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in restaurants without separate ventilation systems for smoking and nonsmoking dining areas [J].
Akbar-Khanzadeh, F .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2003, 58 (02) :97-103
[3]  
[Anonymous], SAMPLING ANAL AIRBOR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, World Health Report, 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life
[5]  
*CDCP, 1986, HLTH CONS INV SMOK R
[6]  
*CDCP WHO, GLOB YOUTH TOB SURV
[7]   Summary of effects of parental smoking on the respiratory health of children and implications for research [J].
Cook, DG ;
Strachan, DP .
THORAX, 1999, 54 (04) :357-365
[8]   A DIFFUSION MONITOR TO MEASURE EXPOSURE TO PASSIVE SMOKING [J].
HAMMOND, SK ;
LEADERER, BP .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 21 (05) :494-497
[9]   OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE [J].
HAMMOND, SK ;
SORENSEN, G ;
YOUNGSTROM, R ;
OCKENE, JK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (12) :956-960
[10]   Exposure of US workers to environmental tobacco smoke [J].
Hammond, SK .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 107 :329-340