PLS score-loading correspondence and a bi-orthogonal factorization

被引:37
作者
Ergon, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Telemark Univ Coll, N-3901 Porsgrunn, Norway
关键词
PLS; factorization; score-loading correspondence;
D O I
10.1002/cem.736
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
It is established industrial practice to use the correspondence between partial least squares (PLS) scores and loadings or loading weights as a means for process monitoring and control. Deviations from the normal operating point in a score plot are then related to the influences from major process variables as shown in a loading or loading weight plot. These relations are often presented in a bi-plot, i.e. appropriately scaled scores and loadings or loading weights are displayed in the same plot. As shown in the present paper, however, the orthogonal PLS algorithm of Wold gives no direct theoretical and graphical correspondence, i.e. the bi-plot will show an angle deviation that causes an interpretational problem. The alternative non-orthogonal PLS algorithm of Martens gives direct correspondence, but the correlated latent variables may then cause another interpretational problem. As a solution to these problems, this paper presents a PLS factorization where both scores and loadings are orthogonal (BPLS), and we show how the Wold and Martens factorizations can easily be transformed to this solution. The result is independent latent variables as well as direct score and loading correspondence. It is also shown that the transformations involved do not affect the predictor found by PLS regression. The score-loading correspondence properties for the different PLS factorizations are discussed using principal component analysis (PCA) as a reference case. An example using industrial paper plant data is included. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 373
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Moderate projection pursuit regression for multivariate response data [J].
Aldrin, M .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1996, 21 (05) :501-531
[2]  
ESBENSEN KH, 2000, MULTIVAR DATA ANAL, P155
[4]  
JOHNSON AJ, 1992, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST, P48
[5]  
Kalivas JH, 1999, J CHEMOMETR, V13, P111, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199903/04)13:2<111::AID-CEM532>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-N
[7]   INTERPRETATION OF LATENT-VARIABLE REGRESSION-MODELS [J].
KVALHEIM, OM ;
KARSTANG, TV .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1989, 7 (1-2) :39-51
[9]  
MARTENS H, 1989, MULTIVARIATE CALIBRA, P121
[10]  
Skagerberg B., 1993, ABB Review, P31