Risk Factors for Complications After Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Experience of 401 Cases at a Single Institution

被引:24
作者
Hida, Koya [1 ,2 ]
Yamaguchi, Takashi [3 ]
Hata, Hiroaki [3 ]
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya [4 ]
Nagayama, Satoshi [1 ]
Tada, Harue [2 ]
Teramukai, Satoshi [2 ]
Fukushima, Masanori [2 ]
Koizumi, Kinya [3 ]
Sakai, Yoshiharu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Div Clin Trial Design & Management, Translat Res Ctr, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Fushimi Ku, Kyoto 6128555, Japan
[4] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
COLON-CANCER; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; WOUND-INFECTION; OPEN COLECTOMY; TERM OUTCOMES; LAXATIVE USE; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-009-0055-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but little is known about perioperative risk factors for complications. Methods Clinical data were reviewed for 401 consecutive unselected colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic Surgery at Kyoto Medical Center between 1998 and 2005. The outcome variable was incidence of postoperative complications. Using logistic regression analysis, 58 background, clinical, preoperative, and intraoperative factors were assessed as potential predictors of complications. Results The set of independent protective factors that had the greatest influence on the incidence of local complications after color) surgery was as follows: cefmetazole use for prophylaxis (versus oral only; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.54) high operative infusion rate (per ml/min; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95) regular laxative use (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.79). and double-stapled anastomosis (versus hand-sewn; OR 0.15. 95% CI 0.03-0.83). Independent risk factors for local complications after rectal surgery were abdominoperineal resection (versus low anterior resection. OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.64-14.9), long operative time (per hour, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.23), and history of heart disease (OR 5.18, 95% CI 1.34-21.5). The occurrence of complications was not found to be associated with overall survival ill this study. Conclusions We identified intraoperative management Such as low operative infusion rate is one of the independent significant risk factors for complications after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in addition to patient characteristics and surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1740
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: Do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? [J].
Blumetti, Jennifer ;
Luu, Myda ;
Sarosi, George ;
Hartless, Kathleen ;
McFarlin, Jackie ;
Parker, Betty ;
Dineen, Sean ;
Huerta, Sergio ;
Asolati, Massimo ;
Varela, Esteban ;
Anthony, Thomas .
SURGERY, 2007, 142 (05) :704-711
[2]
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[3]
Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: Comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens - A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial [J].
Brandstrup, B ;
Tonnesen, H ;
Beier-Holgersen, R ;
Hjortso, E ;
Ording, H ;
Lindorff-Larsen, K ;
Rasmussen, MS ;
Lanng, C ;
Wallin, L ;
Iversen, LH ;
Gramkow, CS ;
Okholm, M ;
Blemmer, T ;
Svendsen, PE ;
Rottensten, HH ;
Thage, B ;
Riis, J ;
Jeppesen, IS ;
Teilum, D ;
Christensen, AM ;
Graungaard, B ;
Pott, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (05) :641-648
[4]
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project [J].
Bratzler, DW ;
Houck, PM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1706-1715
[5]
Rectal cancer surgery in the elderly: A multivariate analysis of outcome risk factors [J].
Bufalari, A ;
Giustozzi, G ;
Burattini, MF ;
Servili, S ;
Bussotti, C ;
Lucaroni, E ;
Ricci, E ;
Sciannameo, F .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 93 (03) :173-180
[6]
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses [J].
Choy, P. Y. G. ;
Bissett, I. P. ;
Docherty, J. G. ;
Parry, B. R. ;
Merrie, A. E. H. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (03)
[7]
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726
[8]
Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study [J].
Holte, K. ;
Foss, N. B. ;
Andersen, J. ;
Valentiner, L. ;
Lund, C. ;
Bie, P. ;
Kehlet, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (04) :500-508
[9]
Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomized, double-blind study [J].
Holte, K ;
Klarskov, B ;
Christensen, DS ;
Lund, C ;
Nielsen, KG ;
Bie, P ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (05) :892-899
[10]
Jacobs M, 1991, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V1, P144