Systematic Review: Glucose Control and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

被引:256
作者
Kelly, Tanika N. [1 ]
Bazzano, Lydia A.
Fonseca, Vivian A.
Thethi, Tina K.
Reynolds, Kristi
He, Jiang
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
CORONARY HEART-DISEASE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; MELLITUS; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY; RISK; VETERANS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00137
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Results from clinical trials examining the effect of intensive glucose control on cardiovascular disease have been conflicting. Purpose: To summarize clinical benefits and harms of intensive versus conventional glucose control for adults with type 2 diabetes. Data Sources: Studies were retrieved by systematically searching the MEDLINE database (January 1950 to April 2009) with no language restrictions. Study Selection: Two independent reviewers screened abstracts or full-text articles to identify randomized trials that compared clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving intensive glucose control and those receiving conventional glucose control. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently abstracted data on study variables and outcomes, including severe hypoglycemia, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Data Synthesis: 5 trials involving 27 802 adults were included. Intensive glucose targets were lower in the 3 most recent trials. Summary analyses showed that compared with conventional control, intensive glucose control reduced the risk for cardiovascular disease (relative risk [RR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.98]; risk difference per 1000 patients per 5 years [RD], -15 [CI, -24 to -5]) but not cardiovascular death (RR, 0.97 [CI, 0.76 to 1.24]; RD, -3 [CI, -14 to 7]) or all-cause mortality (RR, 0.98 [CI, 0.84 to 1.15]; RD, -4 [CI, -17 to 10]). Intensive glucose control increased the risk for severe hypoglycemia (RR, 2.03 [CI, 1.46 to 2.81]; RD, 39 [CI, 7 to 71]). As was seen in the overall analyses, pooled findings from the early and more recent trials showed that intensive glucose control reduced the risk for cardiovascular disease and increased the risk for severe hypoglycemia. Limitation: Summary rather than individual data were pooled across trials. Conclusion: Intensive glucose control reduced the risk for some cardiovascular disease outcomes (such as nonfatal myocardial infarction), did not reduce the risk for cardiovascular death or allcause mortality, and increased the risk for severe hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / W130
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Cardiovascular events and correlates in the Veterans Affairs diabetes feasibility trial - Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on gylcemic control and complications in type II diabetes
    Abraira, C
    Colwell, J
    Nuttall, F
    Sawin, CT
    Henderson, W
    Comstock, JP
    Emanuele, NV
    Levin, SR
    Pacold, I
    Lee, HS
    Silbert, CK
    Cxypoliski, R
    Vasquez, M
    Kernan, D
    Niewoehner, C
    Backes, M
    Bradley, M
    Bradley, M
    Crow, R
    Rubino, F
    Bushnell, D
    Pfeifer, M
    Service, FJ
    Howard, B
    Chew, E
    Hoogwerf, B
    Seigel, D
    Clark, CM
    Olefsky, JM
    Porte, D
    Sussman, KE
    Johnson, N
    Christine, B
    Tir, K
    Sather, M
    Day, P
    Morgan, N
    Deykin, D
    Gold, J
    Huang, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [2] A Randomized Trial of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease
    Frye R.L.
    August P.
    Brooks M.M.
    Hardison R.M.
    Kelsey S.F.
    MacGregor J.M.
    Orchard T.J.
    Chaitman B.R.
    Genuth S.M.
    Goldberg S.H.
    Hlatky M.A.
    Jones T.L.Z.
    Molitch M.E.
    Nesto R.W.
    Sako E.Y.
    Sobel B.E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (24) : 2503 - 2515
  • [3] Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Colhoun, HM
    Betteridge, DJ
    Durrington, PN
    Hitman, GA
    Neil, HAW
    Livingstone, SJ
    Thomason, MJ
    Mackness, MI
    Charlton-Menys, V
    Fuller, JH
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9435) : 685 - 696
  • [4] Collins R, 2003, LANCET, V361, P2005
  • [5] Global and regional mortality from ischaemic heart disease and stroke attributable to higher-than-optimum blood glucose concentration: comparative risk assessment
    Danaei, Goodarz
    Lawes, Carlene M. M.
    Hoorn, Stephen Vander
    Murray, Christopher J. L.
    Ezzati, Majid
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9548) : 1651 - 1659
  • [6] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [7] Intensive glycemic control in the ACCORD and ADVANCE trials
    Dluhy, Robert G.
    McMahon, Graham T.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (24) : 2630 - 2633
  • [8] Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes
    Duckworth, William
    Abraira, Carlos
    Moritz, Thomas
    Reda, Domenic
    Emanuele, Nicholas
    Reaven, Peter D.
    Zieve, Franklin J.
    Marks, Jennifer
    Davis, Stephen N.
    Hayward, Rodney
    Warren, Stuart R.
    Goldman, Steven
    McCarren, Madeline
    Vitek, Mary Ellen
    Henderson, William G.
    Huang, Grant D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (02) : 129 - U62
  • [9] Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus - The Framingham Heart Study
    Fox, Caroline S.
    Coady, Sean
    Sorlie, Paul D.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    Meigs, James B.
    Levy, Daniel
    Savage, Peter J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (12) : 1544 - 1550
  • [10] Trends in cardiovascular complications of diabetes
    Fox, CS
    Coady, S
    Sorlie, PD
    Levy, D
    Meigs, JB
    D'Agostino, RB
    Wilson, PWF
    Savage, PJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (20): : 2495 - 2499