Mixture Simultaneous Factor Analysis for Capturing Differences in Latent Variables Between Higher Level Units of Multilevel Data

被引:18
作者
De Roover, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Vermunt, Jeroen K. [2 ]
Timmerman, Marieke E. [3 ]
Ceulemans, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
factor analysis; latent variables; mixture model clustering; multilevel data; COMMON FACTOR-ANALYSIS; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; LOADING MATRICES; STANDARD ERRORS; MONTE-CARLO; MODEL; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2017.1278604
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Given multivariate data, many research questions pertain to the covariance structure: whether and how the variables (e.g., personality measures) covary. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is often used to look for latent variables that might explain the covariances among variables; for example, the Big Five personality structure. In the case of multilevel data, one might wonder whether or not the same covariance (factor) structure holds for each so-called data block (containing data of 1 higher level unit). For instance, is the Big Five personality structure found in each country or do cross-cultural differences exist? The well-known multigroup EFA framework falls short in answering such questions, especially for numerous groups or blocks. We introduce mixture simultaneous factor analysis (MSFA), performing a mixture model clustering of data blocks, based on their factor structure. A simulation study shows excellent results with respect to parameter recovery and an empirical example is included to illustrate the value of MSFA.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 523
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HUM DEV REP 2000
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLUSTERING OBSERVATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Test Theory A Unified Treat
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 5.0: Basic, Advanced
[5]   STANDARD ERRORS FOR ROTATED FACTOR LOADINGS [J].
ARCHER, CO ;
JENNRICH, RI .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1973, 38 (04) :581-592
[6]   Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (04) :495-508
[7]   1ST-ORDER AND 2ND-ORDER METHODS FOR LEARNING - BETWEEN STEEPEST DESCENT AND NEWTON METHOD [J].
BATTITI, R .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1992, 4 (02) :141-166
[8]   The theoretical status of latent variables [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :203-219
[9]   Older Adults' Affective Experiences Across 100 Days Are Less Variable and Less Complex Than Younger Adults' [J].
Brose, Annette ;
de Roover, Kim ;
Ceulemans, Eva ;
Kuppens, Peter .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2015, 30 (01) :194-208
[10]   CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers [J].
Bulteel, Kirsten ;
Wilderjans, Tom F. ;
Tuerlinckx, Francis ;
Ceulemans, Eva .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 45 (03) :782-791