Prospective evaluation of the Hybrid Capture 2 and AMPLICOR human papillomavirus (HPV) tests for detection of 13 high-risk HPV genotypes in atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance

被引:17
作者
Halfon, Philippe
Trepo, Elisabeth
Antoniotti, Gilles
Bernot, Catherine
Cart-Lamy, Philippe
Khiri, Hacene
Thibaud, Didier
Marron, Jean
Martineau, Agnes
Penaranda, Guillaume
Benmoura, Dominique
Blanc, Bernard
机构
[1] Alphabio Lab, F-13006 Marseille, France
[2] Republ Biol Ctr, Lyon, France
[3] Biomed Lab, Aix Les Bains, France
[4] Clinilab Lab, Meylan, France
[5] Sery Lab, Le Havre, France
[6] Clinilab Lab, Grenoble, France
[7] CDL Pharma, Marseille, France
[8] Hop Ambroise Pare, Dept Gynecol, Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00992-06
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The use of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology in population-based screening programs is currently based on DNA hybridization and PCR assays. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of the Hybrid Capture 2 test (HC2; Digene Corporation) in comparison with that of the recently developed PCR-based AMPLICOR HPV test (Roche Molecular Systems) for the detection of 1.3 hrHPV types. A reverse line blot hybridization assay (Innogenetics) was used as an internal reference standard in discordant cases. Two hundred seventy-one patients with atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) in cervical samples underwent hrHPV testing. The chi-square test was performed to compare respective proportions. Totals of 160/271 (59%) and 156/271 (58%) were found to be positive for hrHPV with HC2 and AMPLICOR, respectively. Concordant results were obtained for 235 (86.7%) of the 271 samples (kappa statistic, 0.73 +/- 0.04). Considering types 26, 53, and 66 as oncogenic types, negative predictive values (NPVs) of HC2 and AMPLICOR were 92.8% and 87.8%, respectively (difference was not significant), and their respective accuracies were 94.8% and 91.9% (difference was not significant). Considering types 26, 53, and 66 as not oncogenic, the respective HC2 and AMPLICOR NPVs were 92.8% and 97.4% (difference was not significant), and accuracy was significantly higher for the AMPLICOR assay (95.9% versus 90.8% for HC2) (P < 0.05). For ASCUS samples, the NPV was 92.8% for HC2 testing and might be compromised if the copy number of HPV DNA was low. The NPV was 97.4% for the AMPLICOR assay and might be compromised if HPV types 26, 53, and 66 were considered oncogenic. The accuracy of these two assays is good and is compatible with routine clinical use in the triage of ASCUS cases.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 316
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2 [J].
Castle, PE ;
Wheeler, CM ;
Solomon, D ;
Schiffman, M ;
Peyton, CL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 122 (02) :238-245
[2]   A prospective study of age trends in cervical human papillomavirus acquisition and persistence in Guanacaste, Costa Rica [J].
Castle, PE ;
Schiffman, M ;
Herrero, R ;
Hildesheim, A ;
Rodriguez, AC ;
Bratti, MC ;
Sherman, ME ;
Wacholder, S ;
Tarone, R ;
Burk, RD .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 191 (11) :1808-1816
[3]   Human papillomavirus type 16 infections and 2-year absolute risk of cervical precancer in women with equivocal or mild cytologic abnormalities [J].
Castle, PE ;
Solomon, D ;
Schiffman, M ;
Wheeler, CM .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (14) :1066-1071
[4]   Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Clifford, GM ;
Smith, JS ;
Aguado, T ;
Franceschi, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (01) :101-105
[5]   Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in low-grade cervical lesions: Comparison by geographic region and with cervical cancer. [J].
Clifford, GM ;
Rana, RK ;
Franceschi, S ;
Smith, JS ;
Gough, G ;
Pimenta, JM .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (05) :1157-1164
[6]   Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the international Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys:: a pooled analysis [J].
Clifford, GM ;
Gallus, S ;
Herrero, R ;
Muñoz, N ;
Snijders, PJF ;
Vaccarella, S ;
Anh, PTH ;
Ferreccio, C ;
Hieu, NT ;
Matos, E ;
Molano, M ;
Rajkumar, R ;
Ronco, G ;
de Sanjosé, S ;
Shin, HR ;
Sukvirach, S ;
Thomas, JO ;
Tunsakul, S ;
Meijer, CJLM ;
Franceschi, S .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9490) :991-998
[7]   Current methods of testing for human papillomavirus [J].
Davies, P ;
Kornegay, J ;
Iftner, T .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) :677-700
[8]  
Gravitt PE, 2000, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V38, P357
[9]  
Koutsky LA, 2000, J NATL CANCER I, V92, P397, DOI 10.1093/jnci/92.5.397
[10]   Human papillomavirus testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay and PCR as screening tools [J].
Kulmala, SM ;
Syrjänen, S ;
Shabalova, I ;
Petrovichev, N ;
Kozachenko, V ;
Podistov, J ;
Ivanchenko, O ;
Zakharenko, S ;
Nerovjna, R ;
Kljukina, L ;
Branovskaja, M ;
Grunberga, V ;
Juschenko, A ;
Tosi, P ;
Santopietro, R ;
Syrjänen, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (06) :2470-2475