The effects of current density and phosphate concentration on phosphate removal from wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron plate electrodes

被引：189

作者：

Irdemez, Sahset ^{[1
]}

Demircioglu, Nuhi ^{[1
]}

Yildiz, Yalcin Sevki ^{[1
]}

Bingul, Zuleyha ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ataturk Univ, Muhendislik Fac Engn, Fak Cevre Muhendisligi Bolumu, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey

来源：

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY | 2006年 / 52卷 / 02期

关键词：

aluminum electrode; electrocoagulation; electrochemical treatment; iron electrode; phosphate removal;

D O I：

10.1016/j.seppur.2006.04.008

中图分类号：

TQ [化学工业];

学科分类号：

0817 ;

摘要：

In this study, effects of initial phosphate concentrations and current densities on the phosphate removal by electrocoagulation using either aluminum or iron plate as electrodes were investigated. In the experiments, the results indicate that increase of initial phosphate concentration has reduced removal rate. But energy consumption has decreased because of wastewater conductivity increase. Efficiency of 100% using aluminum electrodes has been obtained in all of initial phosphate concentration, whereas removal efficiency has decreased by increasing initial phosphate concentration in iron electrodes. Either aluminum or iron electrodes were used to investigate effect of current density. It was found that removal rate and removal efficiency have increased by increasing cur-rent density. But, system energy consumption has increased by increasing current density. It can be said that aluminum electrode is more suitable than iron electrode by taking into account either removal rate and removal efficiencies on phosphate removal by electrocoagulation. Consequently, electrocoagulation is comparatively suitable process for phosphate removal from wastewater. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.

引用

页码：218 / 223

页数：6

共 14 条

[1]

*APHA, 1985, STAND METH EX WAT WA, P437

[2] Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation [J].

Chen, XM ;

Chen, GH ;

Yue, PL .

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 19 (1-2) :65-76

[3] THE OPERATING COST OF ELECTROCOAGULATION [J].

DONINI, JC ;

KAN, J ;

SZYNKARCZUK, J ;

HASSAN, TA ;

KAR, KL .

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 72 (06) :1007-1012

[4]

IRDEMEZ S, IN PRESS J HAZARD MA

[5]

KOBYA M, 2001, J WATER POLLUT CONTR, V11, P25

[6]

Koparal AS, 2002, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V11, P1071

[7] Removal of nitrate from water by electroreduction and electrocoagulation [J].

Koparal, AS ;

Ögütveren, ÜB .

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2002, 89 (01) :83-94

[8]

Koparal AS., 2002, INT J ENVIRON STUD, V59, P323

[9] ELECTROCOAGULATION AND SEPARATION OF AQUEOUS SUSPENSIONS OF ULTRAFINE PARTICLES [J].

MATTESON, MJ ;

DOBSON, RL ;

GLENN, RW ;

KUKUNOOR, NS ;

WAITS, WH ;

CLAYFIELD, EJ .

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1995, 104 (01) :101-109

[10]

ROMANOV AM, 1987, YUG TEKN K 11 15 MAY

← 1 2 →