Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice

被引:135
作者
Isenring, Elisabeth A. [1 ]
Bauer, Judith D.
Capra, Sandra
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.007
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background A randomized controlled trial previously conducted in radiation oncology patients demonstrated that nutrition intervention had a beneficial impact on body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life compared with standard practice, but it did not report on dietary intake data. Objective To determine the impact of nutrition intervention compared with standard practice on dietary intake in outpatients receiving radiotherapy. Design Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Subjects Sixty consecutive radiation oncology outpatients (51 men and nine women; age 61.9 +/- 14 years [mean +/- standard deviation]). Setting Australian private radiotherapy facility. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nutrition intervention (n=29) (nutrition counseling following the American Dietetic Association [ADA] medical nutrition therapy [MNT] protocol for radiation oncology) or standard practice (n=31) (general nutrition talk and booklet). Main outcome measure Dietary intake (protein, energy, fiber) assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting radiotherapy. Statistical analyses Repeated-measures analysis of variance done on an intention to treat basis. Results The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean total energy (P=0.029) and protein intake (P<0.001) compared with the standard practice group. Mean intake per kilogram of body weight for the nutrition intervention group ranged from 28 to 31 kcal/kg/day compared with 25 to 29 kcal/kg/day for the standard practice group (P = 0.022). The nutrition intervention group had a higher mean protein intake (1.1 to 1.3 g/kg/day) compared with the standard practice group (1.0 to 1.1 g/kg/day) (P=0.001). Although the change in fiber intake between the groups was not significant, there was a trend in the anticipated direction (P=0.083). Conclusions Intensive nutrition intervention following the ADA MNT protocol results in improved dietary intake compared with standard practice and seems to beneficially impact nutrition-related outcomes previously observed in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy. The ADA MNT protocol for radiation oncology is a useful guide to the level of nutrition support required.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
*AM DIET ASS MORR, 1998, MED NUTR THER CONT
[3]   Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? [J].
Andreyev, HJN ;
Norman, AR ;
Oates, J ;
Cunningham, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (04) :503-509
[4]   Evaluation of stress factors and body weight adjustments currently used to estimate energy expenditure in hospitalized patients [J].
Barak, N ;
Wall-Alonso, E ;
Sitrin, MD .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2002, 26 (04) :231-238
[5]   Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer [J].
Bauer, J ;
Capra, S ;
Ferguson, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 56 (08) :779-785
[6]  
Burke Bertha S., 1947, JOUR AMER DIETETIC ASSOC, V23, P1041
[7]   RESEARCH PRIORITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY [J].
BUZZARD, IM ;
SIEVERT, YA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1994, 59 (01) :275S-280S
[8]  
CAPRA S, 1998, NUTR DIETA, V55, P4
[9]  
Capra Sandra, 2002, Nutr Clin Pract, V17, P210, DOI 10.1177/0115426502017004210
[10]  
CRESS B, 1997, J AM DIET ASS S1, V97, pA101