On the number of trials needed for P300

被引:192
作者
Cohen, J
Polich, J
机构
[1] Scripps Res Inst, DEPT NEUROPHARMACOL, LA JOLLA, CA 92037 USA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO, DEPT PSYCHOL, LA JOLLA, CA 92093 USA
关键词
event-related potential; P300; probability; modality; signal-averaging; applied/clinical;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00743-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The P300 event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited in n = 24 subjects using auditory and visual stimuli with target probabilities of 0.20 and 0.80 in different conditions. A total of 40 target stimulus ERPs were obtained from each subject and were averaged in two different ways: (1) single-trial averages were obtained by averaging each subsequent pairs of trial blocks (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, etc.); (2) successive averages were obtained by averaging successive blocks of two trials (1-2, 1-4, 1-6, etc.). Statistical analyses demonstrated that for the single-trial averages, P300 measures are variable but not significantly different from one another across trial pairs, whereas successive averages demonstrated systematic decreases in amplitude and slight increases in peak latency. Auditory and visual stimuli produced similar patterns for the two averaging methods, as did target probability. The findings suggest that P300 amplitude stabilizes with approximately 20 target trials for all conditions, and that peak latency changes relatively little during this time. The results are discussed in terms of applied/clinical contexts. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EXPT AGING RES
[2]   BRAIN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS TO COMPLEX TONES IN DEPRESSED-PATIENTS - RELATIONS TO PERCEPTUAL ASYMMETRY AND CLINICAL-FEATURES [J].
BRUDER, GE ;
TENKE, CE ;
STEWART, JW ;
TOWEY, JP ;
LEITE, P ;
VOGLMAIER, M ;
QUITKIN, FM .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 (04) :373-381
[3]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[4]  
DUNCANJOHNSON CC, 1981, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V18, P207
[5]   TOWARD A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMIC CHANGES IN MENTAL WORKLOAD [J].
HUMPHREY, DG ;
KRAMER, AF .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1994, 36 (01) :3-26
[6]  
Johnson R., 1988, Advances in Psychophysiology, V3, P69, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03208.x
[7]   ASSESSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATIC PROCESSING - AN APPLICATION OF DUAL-TASK AND EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL METHODOLOGIES [J].
KRAMER, AF ;
STRAYER, DL .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 26 (1-3) :231-267
[8]   ON THE DEPENDENCE OF P300 LATENCY ON STIMULUS EVALUATION PROCESSES [J].
MAGLIERO, A ;
BASHORE, TR ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 21 (02) :171-186
[9]   ACTIVE AND PASSIVE P3 LATENCY AND PSYCHOMETRIC PERFORMANCE - INFLUENCE OF AGE AND INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES [J].
ODONNELL, BF ;
FRIEDMAN, S ;
SWEARER, JM ;
DRACHMAN, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 12 (02) :187-195
[10]  
PFEFFERBAUM A, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P1035