Clinical outcome and service implications of screening women at increased breast cancer risk from a family history

被引:12
作者
Gui, G. P. H.
Kadayaprath, G.
Darhouse, N.
Self, J.
Ward, A.
A'Hern, R.
Eeles, R.
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Dept Surg, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Breast Diagnost Unit, London SW3 6JJ, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Informat Technol & Stat, London SW3 6JJ, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Translat Canc Genet Team, Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JJ, England
[5] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Translat Canc Genet Team, Canc Genet Unit, London SW3 6JJ, England
来源
EJSO | 2006年 / 32卷 / 07期
关键词
breast cancer risk; breast screening; family history; breast cancer services;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Introduction: The value of special screening for women at moderate breast cancer risk with a family history of breast cancer remains controversial. Little is known about recall rates, false negative outcomes and the impact on clinical service. Despite this, surveillance programmes within breast units have been established in the United Kingdom. Patients and methods: In our institution, screening of women at moderate (lifetime risk, 17-30%) and high risk (> 30%) consisted of annual clinical examination and mammography from the age of 35 years. The active study period ran for four months and each patient was followed through a further screening cycle (whole study period), providing information on interval cancers and detection at the subsequent screen. Results: One thousand one hundred and thirty-two women attended for their incident screen: 137 at high risk, 803 at moderate risk and 192 at standard risk. The median age at cancer diagnosis in the moderate risk group was 54 (range, 45-68) years and the high-risk group 51 (46-52) years, compared to 63 (45-69) years in the standard risk group. Seven cancers were diagnosed during the four-month active study period. Two patients were diagnosed with interval cancers and eight at the next screen, giving a cancer incidence in the whole study period of 17/1132 (1.5%). Thirteen patients had invasive cancer and four had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) The median invasive tumour size was 15 had (range, 7-28) mm and the median DCIS size was 4 (2-30) mm. 10113 (76.9%) invasive cancers were < 20 mm and 2/13 patients (15.4%) with invasive cancer were lymph node positive. The sensitivity and specificity of mammography were 85.7% and 98.8%, respectively. The mammogram recall rate was 27.6 per 1000. The benign to malignant surgery ratio was 8:17. Conclusion: Screening women at increased breast cancer risk is effective. Early detection and recall rates are comparable to that of older women attending the British National Breast Screening Programme. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Screening mammography under age 50 [J].
Antman, K ;
Shea, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (16) :1470-1472
[2]
Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer [J].
Brain, K ;
Gray, J ;
Norman, P ;
France, E ;
Anglim, C ;
Barton, G ;
Parsons, E ;
Clarke, A ;
Sweetland, H ;
Tischkowitz, M ;
Myring, J ;
Stansfield, K ;
Webster, D ;
Gower-Thomas, K ;
Daoud, R ;
Gateley, C ;
Monypenny, I ;
Singhal, H ;
Branston, L ;
Sampson, J ;
Roberts, E ;
Newcombe, R ;
Cohen, D ;
Rogers, C ;
Mansel, R ;
Harper, P .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (16) :1345-1351
[3]
The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review [J].
Brett, J ;
Bankhead, C ;
Henderson, B ;
Watson, E ;
Austoker, J .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (11) :917-938
[4]
Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J ;
Ong, G .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (04) :396-403
[5]
Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[6]
CLAUS EB, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V48, P232
[7]
EASTON D, 1990, CANCER SURV, V9, P395
[8]
EASTON DF, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V56, P265
[9]
Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer [J].
Eccles, DM ;
Evens, DGR ;
Mackay, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 37 (03) :203-209
[10]
The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Wells, CK ;
Howard, DH ;
Feinstein, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (01) :49-52