Association of antinucleosome antibodies with disease flare in serologically active clinically quiescent patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

被引:70
作者
Ng, K. P.
Manson, J. J.
Rahman, A.
Isenberg, D. A.
机构
[1] Ctr Rheumatol, London W1T 4JF, England
[2] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2006年 / 55卷 / 06期
关键词
SLE; flare; antinucleosome antibodies; serologically active; clinically quiescent;
D O I
10.1002/art.22356
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To identify the prevalence of serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) patients in a cohort of 290 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated if the presence of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) or antinucleosome (anti-NCS) antibodies during the SACQ period was associated with future flares. Methods. SACQ patients defined as clinically inactive for 6 months (global British Isles Lupus Activity Group index [BILAG] scores < 6) and serologically active (anti-dsDNA antibodies > 50 units/ml on at least 2 occasions by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were identified. Patient sera collected during the defined SACQ period were also tested for anti-NCS antibodies (ELISA). We retrospectively reviewed patient clinical details and episodes of flare using the BILAG activity index. Results. Twenty-seven (9%) patients were SACQ. Seventeen (81%) patients experienced a flare (total of 91 flares, up to 12 flares per person) in the next 5 years. Median duration to first flare was 15 months (range 2-46). Time to first flare after SACQ period was significantly correlated with the presence of anti-NCS (P = 0.0012), high anti-NCS antibody titers (P = 0.0006), and anti-dsDNA titers 5 times above the normal limit (P = 0.02). Patients with higher absolute anti-NCS antibody titers showed a significant correlation with the number of flares (r = 0.57, P = 0.007). Conclusion. A minority of patients with SLE are SACQ. The majority of these patients experience a flare in the next 5 years and close followup is recommended. Anti-NCS antibodies may be a better predictor than anti-dsDNA antibodies for future flares.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 904
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Amoura Z, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P76, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200001)43:1<76::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-I
[3]   PRESENCE OF NUCLEOSOME-RESTRICTED ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS [J].
CHABRE, H ;
AMOURA, Z ;
PIETTE, JC ;
GODEAU, P ;
BACH, JF ;
KOUTOUZOV, S .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (10) :1485-1491
[4]  
COHEN A S, 1971, Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases, V21, P643
[5]   SEROLOGICALLY ACTIVE CLINICALLY QUIESCENT SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - DISCORDANCE BETWEEN CLINICAL AND SEROLOGIC FEATURES [J].
GLADMAN, DD ;
UROWITZ, MB ;
KEYSTONE, EC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 66 (02) :210-215
[6]  
HAY EM, 1993, Q J MED, V86, P447
[7]  
Ho A, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P2342, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200110)44:10<2342::AID-ART397>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-8
[9]   Anti-dsDNA antibodies: still a useful criterion for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? [J].
Isenberg, D .
LUPUS, 2004, 13 (11) :881-885
[10]  
LEBLANC BAEW, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P2239