A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of oxymorphone extended release for opioid-opioidnaive patients with chronic low naive back pain

被引:113
作者
Katz, Nathaniel
Rauck, Richard
Ahdieh, Harry
Ma, Tina
van der Hoop, Roland Gerritsen
Kerwin, Rosemary
Podolsky, Gilbert
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Carolinas Pain Inst, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Endo Pharmaceut Inc, Chadds Ford, PA USA
[4] Jean Brown Res Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
low back pain; morphine; opioid; oxymorphone;
D O I
10.1185/030079906X162692
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Determine the efficacy and tolerability of oxymorphone extended release ( OPANA ER ER+) in opioid-naive patients with) moderate to severe chronic low back pain ( CLBP). Design and methods: Patients >= 18 years of age were titrated with oxymorphone ER ( 5- to 10-mg increments every 12 h, every 3-7 days) to a well-tolerated, stabilized dose. Patients were then randomized to continue their oxymorphone ER dose or receive placebo every 12 h for 12 weeks. Oxymorphone immediate release was available every 4-6 h, as needed, for the first 4 days and twice daily thereafter. Results: Sixty-three percent of patients ( 205/325) were titrated to a stabilized dose of oxymorphone ER, most ( 203/205) within 1 month. During titration, 18% discontinued from adverse events ( AEs) and 1% from lack of efficacy. For patients completing titration, average pain intensity decreased from 69.4 mm at screening to 22.7 mm ( p < 0.0001). After randomization, 68% of oxymorphone ER and 47% of placebo patients completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. Approximately 8% of patients in each group discontinued because of AEs. Placebo patients discontinued significantly sooner from lack of efficacy than those receiving oxymorphone ER ( p < 0.0001). Pain intensity increased significantly more in the placebo group ( least squares [ LS] mean change 26.9 +/- 2.4 [ median 28.0]) than in the oxymorphone ER group ( LS mean change 10.0 +/- 2.4 [ median 2.0]; p < 0.0001). Oxymorphone ER was generally well tolerated without unexpected AEs. Although limitations of a randomized withdrawal study include the potential for unblinding and opioid withdrawal in placebo patients, opioid withdrawal was limited to two patients in the placebo group and one in the oxymorphone ER group. Conclusions: Stabilized doses of oxymorphone ER were generally safe and effective over a 12-week double-blind treatment period in opioid-naive patients with CLBP.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 128
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetics and dose-proportionality of oxymorphone extended release and its metabolites: Results of a randomized crossover study [J].
Adams, MP ;
Ahdieh, H .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 24 (04) :468-476
[2]   Efficacy of oxymorphone extended release in postsurgical pain: A randomized clinical trial in knee arthroplasty [J].
Ahdieh, H ;
Mo, T ;
Babul, N ;
Lee, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 44 (07) :767-776
[3]   Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained release oral morphine in strong-opioid naive patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Allan, L ;
Richarz, U ;
Simpson, K ;
Slappendel, R .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (22) :2484-2490
[4]   Efficacy of daily and alternate-day dosing regimens with the combination buprenorphine-naloxone tablet [J].
Amass, L ;
Kamien, JB ;
Mikulich, SK .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2000, 58 (1-2) :143-152
[5]  
American Pain Society, 2002, GUID MAN PAIN OST RH
[6]   A CLINICAL-TRIAL OF BUPRENORPHINE - COMPARISON WITH METHADONE IN THE DETOXIFICATION OF HEROIN-ADDICTS [J].
BICKEL, WK ;
STITZER, ML ;
BIGELOW, GE ;
LIEBSON, IA ;
JASINSKI, DR ;
JOHNSON, RE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1988, 43 (01) :72-78
[7]  
BICKEL WK, 1988, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V247, P47
[8]   TRANSDERMAL CLONIDINE COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN PAINFUL DIABETIC NEUROPATHY USING A 2-STAGE ENRICHED ENROLLMENT DESIGN [J].
BYASSMITH, MG ;
MAX, MB ;
MUIR, J ;
KINGMAN, A .
PAIN, 1995, 60 (03) :267-274
[9]   Open-label non-randomized versus double-blind randomized antidepressive treatment: What are the advantages of clinical decision over randomization? [J].
Deuschle, M ;
Krumm, B ;
Bindeballe, N ;
Colla, M ;
Hamann, B ;
Lederbogen, F ;
Gilles, M ;
Heuser, I .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2004, 37 (06) :299-302
[10]   Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin - Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Eisenberg, E ;
McNicol, ED ;
Carr, DB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (24) :3043-3052