Needle Preference in Patients Receiving Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin Type A

被引:11
作者
Price, Kristina M. [1 ]
Williams, Zinaria Y. [2 ]
Woodward, Julie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Eye Ctr, Dept Orbital Oculoplast & Reconstruct Surg, Durham, NC USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Oculoplast & Reconstruct Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; DENTAL NEEDLES; PAIN; ASPIRATION; 27-GAUGE; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01391.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND Patients often complain of pain and bruising from needle injections. Some clinicians believe smaller gauge needles cause less pain. Thirty-gauge needles are currently the standard needles employed for administering botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). OBJECTIVE This study sought to determine whether patients receiving BTX-A have a preference for 30-gauge or 32-gauge needles based on the amount of pain and bruising experienced. METHODS Thirty-seven subjects received BTX-A on the right side of the face using a 30-gauge needle and on the left side using a 32-gauge needle. Subjects were masked to needle size. They were then asked to rate injection pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale and to note any bruising. Physician preference was also evaluated. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of intra-procedural pain (p=.37) or the level of post-procedural pain and discomfort (p=.76) experienced. Twenty-seven percent of subjects reported greater bruising with the 32-gauge needle, versus 29.7% with the 30-gauge needle. The physician injector did not have a preference. Lastly, 83.8% of subjects did not detect a difference in BTX-A paralysis effect. CONCLUSION We do not recommend using 32-gauge needles in place of 30-gauge needles for administering BTX-A. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 112
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Pain following controlled cutaneous insertion of needles with different diameters [J].
Arendt-Nielsen, Lars ;
Egekvist, Henrik ;
Bjerring, Peter .
SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2006, 23 (1-2) :37-43
[2]
BROWNBILL JW, 1987, ANESTH PROG, V43, P215
[3]
COLEY RM, 1987, CLIN PHARMACY, V6, P725
[4]
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE 30-GAUGE DENTAL NEEDLE [J].
COOLEY, RL ;
ROBISON, SF .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1979, 48 (05) :400-404
[5]
Comparative study of different syringes in positive aspiration during inferior alveolar nerve block [J].
Delgado-Molina, E ;
Bueno-Lafuente, S ;
Berini-Aytés, L ;
Gay-Escoda, C .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1999, 88 (05) :557-560
[6]
Evaluation and comparison of 2 needle models in terms of blood aspiration during truncal block of the inferior alveolar nerve [J].
Delgado-Molina, E ;
Tamarit-Borrás, M ;
Berini-Aytés, L ;
Gay-Escoda, C .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 61 (09) :1011-1015
[7]
FARSAKIAN IR, 1991, COMPEND CONTIN ED DE, V12, P262
[8]
Flanagan Terry, 2007, Gen Dent, V55, P216
[9]
PERCEPTION OF PAIN TO 3 DIFFERENT INTRA-ORAL PENETRATIONS OF NEEDLES [J].
FULLER, NP ;
MENKE, RA ;
MEYERS, WJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 99 (05) :822-824
[10]
Hanas R, 2000, Pediatr Diabetes, V1, P142, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-5448.2000.010305.x