Androgen receptor coactivators lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 and four and a half LIM domain protein 2 predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence

被引:363
作者
Kahl, Philip
Gullotti, Lucia
Heukamp, Lukas Carl
Wolf, Susanne
Friedrichs, Nicolaus
Vorreuther, Roland
Solleder, Gerold
Bastian, Patrick J.
Ellinger, Joerg
Metzger, Eric
Schuele, Roland
Buettner, Reinhard
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Sch Med, Inst Pathol, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Bonn, Sch Med, Dept Urol, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[3] Evangel Klniken Bonn GmbH, Dept Urol, Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Freiburg, Sch Med, Clin Res Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1570
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer biology varies from locally confined tumors with low risk for relapse to tumors with high risk for progression even after radical prostatectomy. Currently, there are no reliable biomarkers to predict tumor relapse and poor clinical outcome. In this study, we correlated expression patterns of the androgen receptor (AR) coactivators lysinespecific historic demethylase 1 (LSD1) and four and a half LIM-domain protein 2 (FHL2), AR, Gleason score, Gleason grade, and p53 expression in clinically organ confined prostate cancers with relapse after radical prostatectomy. Our data reveal that high levels of LSD1, nuclear expression of the FHL2 coactivator, high Gleason score and grade, and very strong staining of nuclear p53 correlate significantly with relapse during follow-up. No correlation exists with relapse and the expression of AR and cytoplasmic expression of FHL2. To confirm these data, we did quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot analyses in a subset of tumor specimens. Consistently, both LSD1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly up-regulated in high-risk tumors. We previously identified LSD1 and FHL2 as nuclear cofactors interacting specifically with the AR in prostate cells an showed that both stimulate androgen-dependent gene transcription. Our present study suggests that LSD1 and nuclear FHL2 may serve as novel biomarkers predictive for prostate cancer with aggressive biology and point to a role of LSD1 and FHL2 in constitutive activation of AR-mediated growth signals.
引用
收藏
页码:11341 / 11347
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen: beware the biases [J].
Bunting, PS .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 315 (1-2) :71-97
[2]   A history of prostate cancer treatment [J].
Denmeade, SR ;
Isaacs, JT .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (05) :389-396
[3]   Molecular markers for predicting prostate cancer stage and survival [J].
Dunsmuir, WD ;
Gillett, CE ;
Meyer, LC ;
Young, MP ;
Corbishley, C ;
Eeles, RA ;
Kirby, RS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (07) :869-878
[4]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[5]  
Hsing AW, 2000, INT J CANCER, V85, P60, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000101)85:1&lt
[6]  
60::AID-IJC11&gt
[7]  
3.0.CO
[8]  
2-B
[9]   Differently regulated androgen receptor transcriptional complex in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate [J].
Kinoshita, M ;
Nakagawa, T ;
Shimizu, A ;
Katsuoka, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 12 (04) :390-397
[10]  
Li HY, 2001, CELL MOTIL CYTOSKEL, V48, P11, DOI 10.1002/1097-0169(200101)48:1<11::AID-CM2>3.0.CO