Technology assessment and resource allocation for predictive genetic testing: A study of the perspectives of Canadian genetic health care providers

被引:20
作者
Adair, Alethea [1 ]
Hyde-Lay, Robyn [1 ]
Einsiedel, Edna [2 ]
Caulfield, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hlth Law Inst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Commun & Culture, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS | 2009年 / 10卷
关键词
COVERAGE; SCIENCE; HYPE;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6939-10-6
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With a growing number of genetic tests becoming available to the health and consumer markets, genetic health care providers in Canada are faced with the challenge of developing robust decision rules or guidelines to allocate a finite number of public resources. The objective of this study was to gain Canadian genetic health providers' perspectives on factors and criteria that influence and shape resource allocation decisions for publically funded predictive genetic testing in Canada. Methods: The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 senior lab directors and clinicians at publically funded Canadian predictive genetic testing facilities. Participants were drawn from British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia. Given the community sampled was identified as being relatively small and challenging to access, purposive sampling coupled with snowball sampling methodologies were utilized. Results: Surveyed lab directors and clinicians indicated that predictive genetic tests were funded provincially by one of two predominant funding models, but they themselves played a significant role in how these funds were allocated for specific tests and services. They also rated and identified several factors that influenced allocation decisions and patients' decisions regarding testing. Lastly, participants provided recommendations regarding changes to existing allocation models and showed support for a national evaluation process for predictive testing. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that largely local and relatively ad hoc decision making processes are being made in relation to resource allocations for predictive genetic tests and that a more coordinated and, potentially, national approach to allocation decisions in this context may be appropriate.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HLTH L REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], Webster's New Millennium Dictionary of English
[3]  
BERNARD RH, 2004, RES METHODS ANTHR QU, P189
[4]   Science communication in transition: genomics hype, public engagement, education and commercialization pressures [J].
Bubela, T. .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2006, 70 (05) :445-450
[5]   Genetics as a tool to improve cancer outcomes: ethics and policy [J].
Burke, W ;
Press, N .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (06) :476-482
[6]   Genetic testing in primary care [J].
Burke, W .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2004, 5 :1-14
[7]   Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science [J].
Caulfield, T .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (07) :337-339
[8]  
CHENIER J, 2006, CAN BAR REV, V83, P1
[9]  
Deber R B, 1992, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V8, P131
[10]  
EVANS J, 2004, BRIT MED J, V322, P1052