A multicentre, double-blind study comparing placebo, ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis

被引:51
作者
Olver, I
Paska, W
Depierre, A
Seitz, JF
Stewart, DJ
Goedhals, L
McQuade, B
McRae, J
Wilkinson, JR
机构
[1] GLAXO WELLCOME RES & DEV LTD,GREENFORD UB6 0HE,MIDDX,ENGLAND
[2] ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSP,ADELAIDE,SA 5000,AUSTRALIA
[3] CHU BESANCON,F-25030 BESANCON,FRANCE
[4] INST J PAOLI I CALMETTES,F-13009 MARSEILLE,FRANCE
[5] OTTAWA REG CANC CTR,OTTAWA,ON K1Y 4K7,CANADA
[6] NATL HOSP,BLOEMFONTEIN,SOUTH AFRICA
关键词
cisplatin; delayed emesis and nausea; dexamethasone; ondansetron; 5-HT3 receptor antagonist;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010798
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron, given alone or in combination with dexamethasone in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. Patients and methods: This was an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. A total of 640 chemotherapy-naive patients received ondansetron 8 mg i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. for the control of acute emesis prior to cisplatin (greater than or equal to 70 mg/m(2)) on day 1. Patients who were not rescued or withdrawn on day 1 were to be randomised 24 hours after the start of cisplatin administration to one of four groups; group I placebo oral (p.o.), twice daily (bd) on days 2-6 (n = 125); group II ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) on days 2/3 followed by placebo (p.o. bd) on days 4-6 (n = 199); group III ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) on days 2-6 (n = 214); group IV ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) plus dexamethasone (4 mg p.o. bd) on days 2-6 (n = 66). Results: On day 1, 81% of patients had complete control of acute emesis, with 68% having no emesis and no nausea. Over days 2/3 and over days 2-6, significantly more patients receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group TV) reported no emesis and no nausea (49% and 45%, respectively) compared to ondansetron alone (32% and 27%, respectively) or placebo (group I; 33% and 27%, respectively; P< 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). There were no significant differences in the control of emesis over days 2/3, where 61% of patients had complete emetic control (0 emetic episodes) with ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group TV), 54% with ondansetron (groups II + III) and 49% with placebo (group I). In the distribution of nausea grades, ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV) was significantly superior to ondansetron (groups II + III; P = 0.037) and placebo (group I; P = 0.013) over days 2/3. Over days 2-6 there were no significant differences in the control of emesis, however a comparison of the distribution of nausea grades over days 2-6 showed ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV) to be significantly superior to ondansetron (group III; P = 0.043) and placebo (group I; P = 0.024). All treatments were well tolerated and no unexpected drug-related adverse events were reported. There were no differences in the overall incidence of adverse events between the active treatment groups or placebo. Constipation and headache, recognised side effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, were the most commonly reported adverse events with the incidence of constipation with ondansetron alone (group III) being significantly greater than with placebo over days 2-6 (14% vs. 6%; P = 0.030). Conclusion: In contrast to some previous investigations, in this study, ondansetron alone appears to have a minor role in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea. In conclusion, the combination of oral ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron and to placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 952
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   DEXAMETHASONE AND HIGH-DOSE METOCLOPRAMIDE - EFFICACY IN CONTROLLING CISPLATIN INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
ALLAN, SG ;
CORNBLEET, MA ;
WARRINGTON, PS ;
GOLLAND, IM ;
LEONARD, RCF ;
SMYTH, JF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6449) :878-879
[2]   ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
ABRAHAM, S ;
KAYE, SB ;
SOWERBUTTS, T ;
FREWIN, C ;
FOX, RM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02) :203-208
[3]  
Cunningham D, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P277
[4]   Ondansetron Compared with High-Dose Metoclopramide in Prophylaxis of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting - A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study [J].
Demulder, PHM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Vanliessum, PA ;
Molsjevdevic, S ;
Allman, EL ;
Beranek, P ;
Verweij, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (11) :834-840
[5]  
GANDARA DR, 1991, EUR J CANCER, V27, pS9
[6]  
GRUNBERG SM, 1990, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V9, P327
[7]  
*IT GROUP ANT RES, 1992, LANCET, V340, P96
[8]  
*IT GROUP ANT RES, 1993, J CLIN ONCOL, V11, P2396
[9]  
JIMENEZ MM, 1988, NEOPLASMA, V5, P8
[10]   INCIDENCE, COURSE, AND SEVERITY OF DELAYED NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING THE ADMINISTRATION OF HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN [J].
KRIS, MG ;
GRALLA, RJ ;
CLARK, RA ;
TYSON, LB ;
OCONNELL, JP ;
WERTHEIM, MS ;
KELSEN, DP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (10) :1379-1384