Important Imaging Finding E-mail Alert System: Experience after 3 Years of Implementation

被引:23
作者
Abujudeh, Hani H. [1 ]
Kaewlai, Rathachai
Choy, Garry
Whelton, Dianne G.
Rosenthal, Daniel I.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
RADIOLOGISTS DUTY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2531082217
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an important finding alert (IFA) system that uses e-mail technology to alert referring physicians to an important but nonurgent imaging finding. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the study; the requirement for informed consent was waived. The authors retrospectively reviewed the radiology reports generated from January 2005 to December 2007 to determine how many reports contained an IFA statement, how many IFA messages were sent, and how many such messages were viewed by referring physicians. They reviewed 1000 randomly selected radiology reports that contained the IFA statement to identify the imaging modalities and findings that triggered the radiologists' use of the IFA system. Results: A total of 1540254 radiology reports were generated during the 3-year period. A total of 56 691 (3.7%) reports contained the IFA statement. IFA e-mail messages were sent for 52 883 (93.3%) of the 56 691 reports, and 42 285 (74.6%) of the 56 691 reports were viewed by the referring physicians. The most common important but nonurgent findings were definitive (449 [44.9%] of 1000 reports) and indeterminate (260 [26.0%] of 1000 reports) abnormalities. More than half (n = 503) of the alerts were related to computed tomographic examinations, and the majority (n = 677, 67.7%) of them were initiated by thoracic and abdominal radiologists. Conclusion: The IFA system is a potentially useful method of communicating nonurgent but important imaging findings with use of e-mail technology. (C) RSNA, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 753
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ABUJUDEH HA, 2006, RADIOLOGICAL SOC N A, P772
[2]   The deep pocket [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (05) :1243-1247
[3]   Communicating radiology results [J].
Berlin, L .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9508) :373-375
[4]   Malpractice issues in radiology - Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: Whither goest the radiologist's duty? [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (04) :809-815
[5]   Emerging technologies [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (02) :267-270
[6]   Are radiologists contracted by third parties to interpret radiographs liable for not communicating results directly to patients? [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) :27-33
[7]   Radiology reporting - where does the radiologist's duty end? [J].
Garvey, CH ;
Connolly, S .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9508) :443-445
[8]   Communicating Critical Test Results: Safe Practice Recommendations [J].
Hanna, Doris ;
Griswold, Paula ;
Leape, Lucian L. ;
Bates, David W. .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2005, 31 (02) :68-80
[9]  
Hickson Gerald B, 2007, N C Med J, V68, P362
[10]  
Kushner David C, 2005, J Am Coll Radiol, V2, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.005