The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?

被引:101
作者
Caramazza, A [1 ]
Costa, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
speech production; lexical access; picture-word interference; WEAVER plus;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00082-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In three picture-word interference experiments we explore some properties of the semantic interference (SI) effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, we test whether SI may be obtained when the distracter words are not part of the response set and when only one picture per semantic category is included in the experiment. In Experiment 3, we explore if the magnitude of the SI effect depends on whether or not the distracter words are part of the response set. Reliable SI effects were obtained in all three experiments and the magnitude of the effect did not vary as a function of whether or not distracter words are part of the response set. These results are problematic for the selection mechanism in the WEAVER++ lexical access model (Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22, 1-75; Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. (C). 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:B51 / B64
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J].
Caramazza, A .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 14 (01) :177-208
[2]   Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection? [J].
Costa, A ;
Miozzo, M ;
Caramazza, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (03) :365-397
[3]   CONTEXT EFFECTS IN STROOP-LIKE WORD AND PICTURE-PROCESSING [J].
GLASER, WR ;
GLASER, MO .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1989, 118 (01) :13-42
[4]   THE TIME COURSE OF PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE [J].
GLASER, WR ;
DUNGELHOFF, FJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (05) :640-654
[5]   PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE INCREASES WITH TARGET SET SIZE [J].
LA HEIJ, W ;
VANDENHOF, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1995, 58 (02) :119-133
[6]   COMPONENTS OF STROOP-LIKE INTERFERENCE IN PICTURE NAMING [J].
LA HEIJ, W .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1988, 16 (05) :400-410
[7]  
Levelt WJM, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P1
[8]   SEMANTIC NATURE OF RESPONSE COMPETITION IN THE PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE TASK [J].
LUPKER, SJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (06) :485-495
[9]   INPUT, DECISION, AND RESPONSE FACTORS IN PICTURE-WORD INTERFERENCE [J].
LUPKER, SJ ;
KATZ, AN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1981, 7 (04) :269-282
[10]   HALF A CENTURY OF RESEARCH ON THE STROOP EFFECT - AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW [J].
MACLEOD, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (02) :163-203