How to develop a business case for quality

被引:31
作者
Reiter, Kristin L.
Kilpatrick, Kerry E.
Greene, Sandra B.
Lohr, Kathleen N.
Leatherman, Sheila
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
business case for quality; business case methods; return on investment; quality improvement;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzl067
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To describe the steps in developing a business case for quality-enhancing interventions (QEIs) in health care. Analysis. The development of a business case for QEIs in health care involves 11 steps. These steps include (1) describing the intervention, (2) determining perspective, (3) identifying the effects of the intervention on quality, (4) designing the study, (5) identifying and measuring cash flows, (6) considering the effects of capacity constraints, (7) selecting a measure of return on investment, (8) determining the time horizon for the analysis, (9) determining the discount rate, (10) adjusting costs and savings for inflation, and (11) determining organizational readiness for business case development. A checklist offers guidance on assessing readiness for the business case. Conclusion. The absence of a 'business case' for quality is frequently cited as the reason health care organizations do not implement QEIs, despite decades of careful research demonstrating their effectiveness. Our continuing commitment to advancing the discipline of business case analysis is based on a belief that delineating the cost and economic implications of investments in QEIs is a critical threshold issue to widespread adoption of evidence-based quality improvements. We believe it is appropriate and timely to consider how best to standardize approaches and move the field of business case analysis forward.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 55
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[2]   The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality [J].
Kilpatrick, KE ;
Lohr, KN ;
Leatherman, S ;
Pink, G ;
Buckel, JM ;
Legarde, C ;
Whitener, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (04) :347-355
[3]   The business case for quality: Case studies and an analysis [J].
Leatherman, S ;
Berwick, D ;
Iles, D ;
Lewin, LS ;
Davidoff, F ;
Nolan, T ;
Bisognano, M .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (02) :17-30
[4]  
LEWIS A, 2006, LEADERS GUIDE CREATI
[5]  
LIU Y, 2006, MEASURING DM PROGRAM
[6]  
LUCE B, 1990, STANDARDS SOCIOECONI
[7]   The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States [J].
McGlynn, EA ;
Asch, SM ;
Adams, J ;
Keesey, J ;
Hicks, J ;
DeCristofaro, A ;
Kerr, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (26) :2635-2645
[8]   A risk-adjusted approach to comparing the return on investment in health care programs. [J].
Sendi P. ;
Al M.J. ;
Zimmermann H. .
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 2004, 4 (3) :199-210
[9]  
*US DEP VET AFF, 2006, HLTH SERV RES DEV SE