Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemispheric asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance

被引:70
作者
Triggs, WJ [1 ]
Calvanio, R [1 ]
Levine, M [1 ]
机构
[1] SPAULDING REHABIL HOSP,DEPT NEUROPSYCHOL,BOSTON,MA
关键词
psychomotor performance; motor skills; laterality; magnetic stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00077-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Hemispheric asymmetries in the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are associated with hand preference. We posited that hemispheric asymmetries in TMS thresholds may be strongly correlated with some hand-differences in motor performance. MEPs result from the activation of neuronal networks targeting large cortical motoneurons. Thus, MEP thresholds might reflect physiological features of the corticospinal motor system. Considering the role of corticospinal pathways in the control of independent finger movement, we hypothesized that MEP thresholds would better predict speed and dexterity than strength. In 30 right-handers and 30 left-handers, we correlated right and left hand-differences in the threshold for eliciting MEPs with hand-differences in the performance of three manual tasks: finger-tapping speed, pegboard dexterity, and grip strength. Correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in performance indicated that a lower TMS threshold for one hand is strongly associated with greater ability with that hand. The correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in finger-tapping and pegboard dexterity were significantly larger than the correlation of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in grip strength. Our results indicate that hemispheric asymmetries in MEP thresholds may have functional significance related to basic parameters of movement. These results are consistent with the critical role of the corticospinal motor system in the control of independent finger movement. Furthermore, they imply that asymmetry in the corticospinal motor system may be an important substrate for asymmetries in hand preference and performance. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1363
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   CONTROL OF MOVEMENT IN THE PREFERRED AND NON-PREFERRED HANDS [J].
ANNETT, J ;
ANNETT, M ;
HUDSON, PTW ;
TURNER, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 31 (NOV) :641-652
[2]   RELIABILITY OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HANDS IN MOTOR SKILL [J].
ANNETT, M ;
HUDSON, PTW ;
TURNER, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1974, 12 (04) :527-531
[3]   GROWTH OF MANUAL PREFERENCE AND SPEED [J].
ANNETT, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (04) :545-&
[4]  
Annett M., 1985, Left, Right, Hand and Brain: The Right Shift Theory
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis
[6]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[7]   HANDEDNESS - PROFICIENCY VERSUS STATED PREFERENCE [J].
BARNSLEY, RH ;
RABINOVI.MS .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1970, 30 (02) :343-&
[8]  
BERIC A, 1997, IN PRESS J NERUOLOGY
[9]   PARKINSONS-DISEASE RIGIDITY - MAGNETIC MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN A SMALL HAND MUSCLE [J].
CANTELLO, R ;
GIANELLI, M ;
BETTUCCI, D ;
CIVARDI, C ;
DEANGELIS, MS ;
MUTANI, R .
NEUROLOGY, 1991, 41 (09) :1449-1456
[10]  
CARROLL JB, 1993, HUMAN COGNITIVE ABIL, P532