Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years

被引:155
作者
Govaerts, PJ [1 ]
De Beukelaer, C [1 ]
Daemers, K [1 ]
De Ceulaer, G [1 ]
Yperman, M [1 ]
Somers, T [1 ]
Schatteman, I [1 ]
Offeciers, FE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, St Augustinus Hosp, Univ Dept Otolaryngol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
pediatric cochlear implant; children; outcome; integration; hearling loss; early intervention;
D O I
10.1097/00129492-200211000-00013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of cochlear implantation in young children in relation to the age at implantation. Study Design: A retrospective longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of pediatric cochlear implant patients. Patients: All children with congenital deafness who underwent implantation before the age of 6 years (n = 48 for the longitudinal analysis and n = 70 for the cross-sectional analysis) Interventions: All children received a multichannel cochlear implant. Main Outcome Measures: Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score and integration into the mainstream school system. Results: For all children, the CAP score increased after implantation. Implantation beyond the age of 4 years hardly ever resulted in normal CAP scores or in integration into the mainstream primary school (20 to 30% of cases). Implantation between the age of 2 and 4 years always resulted in normal CAP scores after 3 years with a 66% probability of integration into the primary school. Implantation before the age of 2 years always resulted in immediate normalization of the CAP scores, with a 90% probability of integration into the mainstream kindergarten, well before entrance into the primary school. Conclusion: All children with congenital deafness who underwent implantation before the age of 6 years appeared to benefit from the implant. However, these data add evidence to the importance of early implantation (before the age of 2 years). Intervention before the age of 4 years seemed to be critical to avoid irreversible auditory performance losses, and intervention before the age of 2 years seemed to be critical to achieve optimal results.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 890
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Archbold S, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P312
[2]   Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability [J].
Archbold, S ;
Lutman, ME ;
Nikolopoulos, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) :7-11
[3]   The efficacy of early identification and intervention for children with hearing impairment [J].
Downs, MP ;
Yoshinaga-Itano, C .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 46 (01) :79-+
[4]   A two-stage bipodal screening model for universal neonatal hearing screening [J].
Govaerts, PJ ;
Yperman, M ;
De Ceulaer, G ;
Daemers, K ;
Van Driessche, K ;
Somers, T ;
Offeciers, FE .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (06) :850-854
[5]   Speech perception results for children implanted with the CLARION® cochlear implant at the Medical University of Hannover [J].
Illg, A ;
von der Haar-Heise, S ;
Goldring, JE ;
Lesinski-Schiedat, A ;
Battmer, RD ;
Lenarz, T .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04) :93-98
[6]  
Miyamoto RT, 1999, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V119, P219
[7]   Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing [J].
Moeller, MP .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (03) :E43
[8]   Age at implantation: Its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation [J].
Nikolopoulos, TP ;
O'Donoghue, GM ;
Archbold, S .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1999, 109 (04) :595-599
[9]  
OFFECIERS FE, 1991, THESIS U ANTWERP UIA
[10]   COCHLEAR IMPLANTS - THE LAURA PROSTHESIS [J].
PEETERS, S ;
MARQUET, J ;
OFFECIERS, FE ;
BOSIERS, W ;
KINSBERGEN, J ;
VANDURME, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 13 (1-2) :76-80