Simple scoring system for the prediction of the prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis

被引:55
作者
Ueda, Takashi
Takeyama, Yoshifumi
Yasuda, Takeo
Matsumura, Naoki
Sawa, Hidehiro
Nakajima, Takahiro
Ajiki, Tetsuo
Fujino, Yasuhiro
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Kuroda, Yoshikazu
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
[2] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Osaka 577, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2006.05.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. In severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), it is important clinically to predict the prognosis at the time of admission. Most scoring systems for severity of acute pancreatitis consist of multiple factors and are complicated. This investigation aimed to propose a simple scoring system for the prediction of the prognosis of SAP. Methods. Prognostic factors were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve analyses and multivariate analysis from data that were obtained on admission of 13 7 patients with SAP. A simple scoring system with 3 most useful factors was made, and its usefulness was investigated in comparison with conventional scoring systems. Results. Three prognostic factors were selected: serum blood urea nitrogen >= 25 mg/dL, serum lactate dehydrogenase >= 900 IU/L, and contrast-enhanced computed tomagraphy finding with pancreatic necrosis. On admission, 13 7 patients were classified from 0 to 3 by the number of positive items (simple prognostic score [SPS]). Mortality rates for patients whose SPS was 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 2% (1/42 patients), 18% (7/40 patients), 48% (12/25 patients), and 67% (20/30 patients), respectively. Furthermore, when usefulness of SPS was compared with conventional scoring systems, the area under the curve by receiver operator characteristic curve analyses in SPS was 0.83; the Ranson score was 0.83; the Japanese severity score was 0.83; the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 0.81, and the Glasgow score was 0.75. After onset, SPS kept almost same levels from day 2 to day 6, and a significant difference was observed between survivors and nonsurvivors from day 1 to day 6 Conclusion. This scoring system that comprised 3 items is simple, is feasible for the prediction of prognosis and conventional scoring systems, and is useful for the selection; of the extremely severe patients with SAP on admission.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AGARWAL N, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P356
[2]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
ROBINSON, DL ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
RANSON, JHC .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :331-336
[3]   Acute pancreatitis: Assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation [J].
Balthazar, EJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) :603-613
[4]   IMAGING AND INTERVENTION IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
FREENY, PC ;
VANSONNENBERG, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :297-306
[5]  
BLARNEY SL, 1984, GUT, V25, P1340
[6]  
BRADLEY EL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P586
[7]  
BUCHLER M, 1986, INT J PANCREATOL, V1, P227
[8]   Dynamic nature of early organ dysfunction determines outcome in acute pancreatitis [J].
Buter, A ;
Imrie, CW ;
Carter, CR ;
Evans, S ;
McKay, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) :298-302
[9]   VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 202 PATIENTS [J].
CLAVIEN, PA ;
HAUSER, H ;
MEYER, P ;
ROHNER, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 155 (03) :457-466
[10]  
Dervenis C, 1999, INT J PANCREATOL, V25, P195