What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics

被引:226
作者
Cottrell, Catherine A. [1 ]
Neuberg, Steven L.
Li, Norman P.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
trustworthiness; cooperation; relationships; groups; personality; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE; MOTIVATION LOSSES; PERSONALITY; PERCEPTION; INGROUP; MARKERS; IDEALS; MATTER; TRUST;
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans, as discriminately social creatures, make frequent judgments about others' suitability for interdependent social relations. Which characteristics of others guide these judgments and, thus, shape patterns of human affiliation? Extant research is only minimally useful for answering this question. On the basis of a sociofunctional analysis of human sociality, the authors hypothesized that people highly value trustworthiness and (to a lesser extent) cooperativeness in others with whom they may be interdependent, regardless of the specific tasks, goals, or functions of the group or relationship, but value other favorable characteristics (e.g., intelligence) differentially across such tasks, goals, or functions. Participants in 3 studies considered various characteristics for ideal members of interdependent groups (e.g., work teams, athletic teams) and relationships (e.g., family members, employees). Across different measures of trait importance and different groups and relationships, trustworthiness was considered extremely important for all interdependent others; the evidence for the enhanced importance of cooperativeness across different interdependence contexts was more equivocal. In contrast, people valued other characteristics primarily as they were relevant to the specific nature of the interdependent group or relationship. These empirical investigations illuminate the essence of human sociality with its foundation of trust and highlight the usefulness of a theoretically derived framework of valued characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 231
页数:24
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[2]   LIKABLENESS RATINGS OF 555 PERSONALITY-TRAIT WORDS [J].
ANDERSON, NH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 9 (03) :272-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TRUST ORG FRONTIERS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Primate Social Systems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man
[6]   A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Lee, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 (05) :327-353
[7]  
Ashton MC, 2000, EUR J PERSONALITY, V14, P359, DOI 10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<359::AID-PER382>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-Y
[9]   A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Lee, K ;
Perugini, M ;
Szarota, P ;
de Vries, RE ;
Di Blas, L ;
Boies, K ;
De Raad, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (02) :356-366
[10]   TRUST AND ANTITRUST [J].
BAIER, A .
ETHICS, 1986, 96 (02) :231-260