共 36 条
Sepsis Presenting in Hospitals versus Emergency Departments: Demographic, Resuscitation, and Outcome Patterns in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort
被引:24
作者:
Leisman, Daniel E.
[1
,2
,3
]
Angel, Catalina
[1
]
Schneider, Sandra M.
[2
,4
]
D'Amore, Jason A.
[2
]
D'Angelo, John K.
[2
]
Doerfler, Martin E.
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
[3] Global Sepsis Alliance, Jena, Germany
[4] Amer Coll Emergency Phys, Irving, TX USA
[5] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Med, Hempstead, NY USA
[6] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Sci Educ, Hempstead, NY USA
关键词:
INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS;
REDUCED MORTALITY;
SURVIVAL;
BUNDLE;
CARE;
IMPLEMENTATION;
INITIATION;
ADMISSION;
THERAPY;
MOTION;
D O I:
10.12788/jhm.3188
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Differences between hospital-presenting sepsis (HPS) and emergency department-presenting sepsis (EDPS) are not well described. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) quantify the prevalence of HPS versus EDPS cases and outcomes; (2) compare HPS versus EDPS characteristics at presentation; (3) compare HPS versus EDPS in process and patient outcomes; and (4) estimate risk differences in patient outcomes attributable to initial resuscitation disparities. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort. SETTING: Nine hospitals from October 1, 2014, to March 31, 2016. PATIENTS: All hospitalized patients with sepsis or septic shock, as defined by simultaneous (1) infection, (2) >= 2 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and (3) = 1 acute organ dysfunction criterion. EDPS met inclusion criteria while physically in the emergency department (ED). HPS met the criteria after leaving the ED. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed overall HPS versus EDPS contributions to case prevalence and outcomes, and then compared group differences. Process outcomes included 3-hour bundle compliance and discrete bundle elements (eg, time to antibiotics). The primary patient outcome was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 11,182 sepsis hospitalizations, 2,509 (22.4%) were hospital-presenting. HPS contributed 785 (35%) sepsis mortalities. HPS had more frequent heart failure (OR: 1.31, CI: 1.18-1.47), renal failure (OR: 1.62, CI: 1.38-1.91), gastrointestinal source of infection (OR: 1.84, CI: 1.48-2.29), euthermia (OR: 1.45, CI: 1.10-1.92), hypotension (OR: 1.85, CI: 1.65-2.08), or impaired gas exchange (OR: 2.46, CI: 1.43-4.24). HPS were admitted less often from skilled nursing facilities (OR: 0.44, CI: 0.32-0.60), had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 0.53, CI: 0.36-0.78), tachypnea (OR: 0.76, CI: 0.58-0.98), or acute kidney injury (OR: 0.82, CI: 0.68-0.97). In a propensity-matched cohort (n = 3,844), HPS patients had less than half the odds of 3-hour bundle compliant care (17.0% vs 30.3%, OR: 0.47, CI: 0.40-0.57) or antibiotics within three hours (66.2% vs 83.8%, OR: 0.38, CI: 0.32-0.44) vs EDPS. HPS was associated with higher mortality (31.2% vs 19.3%, OR: 1.90, CI: 1.64-2.20); 23.3% of this association was attributable to differences in initial resuscitation (resuscitation-adjusted OR: 1.69, CI: 1.43-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: HPS differed from EDPS by admission source, comorbidities, and clinical presentation. These patients received markedly less timely initial resuscitation; this disparity explained a moderate proportion of mortality differences. (C) 2019 Society of Hospital Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 348
页数:9
相关论文