Rasch analysis of the Roland Disability Questionnaire

被引:40
作者
Garratt, AM
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Sci, Unit Hlth Care Epidemiol, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, Gen Practice Res Framework, London, England
关键词
low back pain; patient-assessed health outcomes; Rasch analysis; Roland Disability Questionnaire;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200301010-00019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A cross-sectional survey using patient questionnaires was conducted. Objective. To assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire satisfies the Rasch model including unidimensionality and item separation. Summary of Background Data. The Roland Disability Questionnaire, the most widely used patient-assessed measure of health outcome for back pain, has undergone several evaluation for its measurements properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. However, there is no published work relating to the underlying dimensionality of the instrument and the extent to which individual items contribute to the construct of physical disability resulting from low back pain. Methods. Patients entering a randomized controlled trial of exercise, manipulation, and usual management for back pain completed a questionnaire that included the Roland Disability Questionnaire. The Winsteps program was used to assess whether the Roland Disability Questionnaire fits the Rasch model. Item fit was assessed using the Infit and the Outfit statistics. Results. The Roland Disability Questionnaire was completed by 1008 (90%) of the patients taking part in the trial. Most of the items in the Roland Disability Questionnaire contribute to a single underlying construct. However, four items had poor Outfit statistics, suggesting that they do not contribute sufficiently to the scale hierarchy. Several items positioned around the middle of the hierarchy are not sufficiently distinct in terms of difficulty. There were very few items positioned at the extremes of the hierarchy. Conclusions. The Roland Disability Questionnaire largely satisfies the Rasch model for unidimensionality. However, the instrument could be improved through the removal of poorly fitting items and the addition of items at the upper and lower points of the scale heirarchy. The distribution of Roland Disability Questionnaire scores should be carefully considered before statistical testing is undertaken. Rasch transformed scores can be used to deal with deficiencies in the scale hierarchy.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Andrich D., 2011, Rasch models for measurement
[2]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[4]  
CARP F, 1989, SPECIAL RES METHODS, P91
[5]  
Cella D, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P66
[6]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[7]   ASSESSING THE RESPONSIVENESS OF FUNCTIONAL SCALES TO CLINICAL-CHANGE - AN ANALOGY TO DIAGNOSTIC-TEST PERFORMANCE [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CENTOR, RM .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (11) :897-906
[8]   MEASUREMENT-RELATED PROBLEMS IN FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT [J].
FISHER, WP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1993, 47 (04) :331-338
[9]  
KLABERMOFFETT J, 1999, BRIT MED J, V319, P279
[10]  
KLEIN RG, 1990, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V71, P34