Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2.: The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod

被引:46
作者
Lisson, SN
Mendham, NJ
Carberry, PS
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Dept Agr Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] CSIRO Trop Agr, Agr Prod Syst Res Unit, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
hemp; model; phenology; flowering; photoperiod response;
D O I
10.1071/EA99059
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The duration from sowing to flowering is an important determinant of fibre yield potential in hemp, since maximum stem yield occurs shortly after flowering. As a short-day plant, daylength has a key influence on the timing of flowering in hemp. This paper reports on studies into the effect of photoperiod on the thermal time duration from sowing to flowering for 2 hemp cultivars, and develops parameters to enable simulation of post-emergent phenology in the hemp model described in the final paper of this series. The hemp model divides the post-emergent period into a vegetative phase that ends at floral initiation, a flower development phase (FDP) between flower initiation and appearance, and a short phase between first flower appearance and harvest maturity (male anthesis). The vegetative phase is further divided into a temperature-dependent basic vegetative phase (BVP) and a daylength-dependent photoperiod induced phase (PIP). For a short-day plant, the duration of PIP is assumed to be zero degree days at daylengths below a base or maximum optimum photoperiod (MOP). Daylengths in excess of the MOP lead to an increase in thermal time within PIP, the duration of which is determined by a genotype's photoperiod sensitivity (PS). Two hemp genotypes, Kompolti and Futura 77, were exposed to 6 different photoperiod regimes ranging from 8 to 16 h in a growth chamber. Thermal time durations from emergence to flower initiation and first flower formation (harvest) were calculated from thermograph plots. The flowering responses for the 2 cultivars were typical for a short-day plant, with flowering occurring rapidly in daylengths less than about 14 h and with increasing delay at longer photoperiods. With the exception of a longer thermal time duration from flower formation to harvest maturity in the case of Kompolti, the 2 cultivars had similar values for the key phenology parameters. Respectively, for Futura and Kompolti: BVP was 383 degrees Cd and 390 degrees Cd, MOP was 14 h and 13.8 h, PS was 266 degrees Cd/h and 252 degrees Cd/h, and FDP was 76.8 degrees Cd and 80.2 degrees Cd.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 417
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   PHOTOPERIODIC RESPONSES OF HEMP [J].
BORTHWICK, HA ;
SCULLY, NJ .
BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1954, 116 (01) :14-29
[2]   A SIMULATION-MODEL OF KENAF FOR ASSISTING FIBER INDUSTRY PLANNING IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA .1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND PHENOLOGICAL MODEL [J].
CARBERRY, PS ;
MUCHOW, RC ;
WILLIAMS, R ;
STURTZ, JD ;
MCCOWN, RL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1992, 43 (07) :1501-1513
[3]   EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD ON FLOWERING IN SOYA BEAN [GLYCINE-MAX (L) MERRILL] - A QUANTITATIVE MODEL [J].
HADLEY, P ;
ROBERTS, EH ;
SUMMERFIELD, RJ ;
MINCHIN, FR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1984, 53 (05) :669-681
[4]  
HESLOP-HARRISON J., 1969, The induction of flowering. Some case histories., P205
[5]  
HESLOPHARRISON J, 1972, PHYSL DEV SEEDS SEXU, P13
[6]   Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 4.: Model description and validation [J].
Lisson, SN ;
Mendham, NJ ;
Carberry, PS .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (03) :425-432
[7]  
LISSON SN, 1998, THESIS U TASMANIA HO
[8]   PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF ALFALFA (MEDICAGO-SATIVA L) CULTIVARS [J].
MAJOR, DJ ;
HANNA, MR ;
BEASLEY, BW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (01) :87-93
[9]   TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD EFFECTS MEDIATED BY THE SORGHUM MATURITY GENES [J].
MAJOR, DJ ;
ROOD, SB ;
MILLER, FR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (02) :305-310