Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education

被引:150
作者
Chen, Jui-Kuei [2 ]
Chen, I-Shuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Business & Management, Taipei 10616, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Grad Inst Futures Studies, Taipei 10616, Taiwan
关键词
Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL); Fuzzy analytic network process (FANP); Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS); Innovation support system (ISS);
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.079
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increasing numbers of Taiwanese higher education institutes are pursuing innovation operation. However, these institutes generally rely greatly on academic research to evaluate innovation performance. Nevertheless, the performance of innovation may be affected by numerous factors that are often beyond the scope of a single academic study. Thus, to address this concern, this paper constructs an innovation support system (ISS) for Taiwanese higher education institutes to comprehensively evaluate their innovation performance. Previous research often evaluates performance by independently considering a number of criteria. However, this assumption of independence does not model the so-called "real world"; thus, we present a novel conjunctive multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach that addresses dependent relationships among each measurement criteria. As such, we utilize a decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), a fuzzy analytical network process (FANP), and a technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) forming order to develop an innovation support system (ISS) that considers the interdependence and the relative weights of each measurement criterion. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1981 / 1990
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[2]   TOP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATIONS IN BANKING - DOES THE COMPOSITION OF THE TOP TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
BANTEL, KA ;
JACKSON, SE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 10 :107-124
[3]  
Chen J., 2008, Journal of American Academy of Business, V13, P151
[4]  
Chen MC., 2005, J Shih Yu, V456, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ESWA.2009.06.079
[5]  
Chin J. M., 2006, J ED RES DEV, V2, P123
[6]  
Daft RichardL., 2008, Organization Theory and Design, V10th
[7]   Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models [J].
Damanpour, F .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (05) :693-716
[8]  
Gabus A., 1972, World Problems an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of Dematel
[9]   Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL [J].
Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng ;
Cheng-Hsin Chiang ;
Chung-Wei Li .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2007, 32 (04) :1028-1044
[10]   Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry [J].
Huang, Chi-Yo ;
Shyu, Joseph Z. ;
Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung .
TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (12) :744-765