Risk-cost decision framework for aquifer remediation design

被引:22
作者
James, BR
Gwo, JP
Toran, L
机构
[1] OAK RIDGE NATL LAB,CTR COMPUTAT SCI,OAK RIDGE,TN 37831
[2] OAK RIDGE NATL LAB,DIV ENVIRONM SCI,OAK RIDGE,TN 37831
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 1996年 / 122卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:6(414)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The writers present a framework for increasing the effectiveness of remedial design decisionmaking at ground-water contamination sites where there is uncertainty in many parameters that affect remediation design. It is specifically designed for broad, ''big picture'' analyses, such as in the preliminary stages of remedial design. The presented framework is used to (1) select the best remedial design from a suite of possible ones; (2) estimate if additional data collection is cost-effective; and (3) determine the most important parameters to be sampled. The framework is developed by combining elements from Latin-Hypercube simulation of contaminant transport, economic risk-cost analysis, and regional sensitivity analysis (RSA). The framework is demonstrated using a hypothetical contamination problem where radionuclide strontium (Sr-90) is leaching from a trench into the ground water. Three remediation design alternatives are considered: monitoring only, isolating the source trench, and installing a plume containment and treatment system. Uncertainty in remediation design performance is due to uncertainty in 13 flow and transport parameters including hydraulic conductivity and source strength. The methodology can be applied to a variety of remediation problems.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AUSLANDER DM, 1982, ASME, V104, P20
[2]  
BECK MB, 1987, WATER RESOUR RES, V23, P1939
[3]  
Ben-Zvi M., 1988, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V2, P11, DOI [10.1007/BF00421927, DOI 10.1007/BF00421927]
[4]   SAMPLING DESIGN FOR CLASSIFYING CONTAMINANT LEVEL USING ANNEALING SEARCH ALGORITHMS [J].
CHRISTAKOS, G ;
KILLAM, BR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (12) :4063-4076
[5]   BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY APPLIED TO DESIGN IN HYDROLOGY [J].
DAVIS, DR ;
DUCKSTEI.L ;
KISIEL, CC .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1972, 8 (01) :33-&
[6]   HYDROGEOLOGICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS .1. A FRAMEWORK [J].
FREEZE, RA ;
MASSMANN, J ;
SMITH, L ;
SPERLING, T ;
JAMES, B .
GROUND WATER, 1990, 28 (05) :738-766
[7]   HYDROGEOLOGICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS .4. THE CONCEPT OF DATA WORTH AND ITS USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE INVESTIGATION STRATEGIES [J].
FREEZE, RA ;
JAMES, B ;
MASSMANN, J ;
SPERLING, T ;
SMITH, L .
GROUND WATER, 1992, 30 (04) :574-588
[8]  
GATES JS, 1974, WATER RESOUR RES, V10, P1031, DOI 10.1029/WR010i005p01031
[9]  
Grosser PW., 1985, CIV ENG SYST, V2, P186, DOI [10.1080/02630258508970405, DOI 10.1080/02630258508970405]
[10]   EUTROPHICATION IN PEEL INLET .1. PROBLEM-DEFINING BEHAVIOR AND A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL FOR THE PHOSPHORUS SCENARIO [J].
HORNBERGER, GM ;
SPEAR, RC .
WATER RESEARCH, 1980, 14 (01) :29-42