The multicriteria analysis for construction of benchmarkers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management

被引:31
作者
de Moraes, Luciano [1 ]
Garcia, Renato [1 ]
Ensslin, Leonardo [2 ]
da Conceicao, Mario Jose [3 ]
de Carvalho, Stella Maris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Inst Biomed Engn, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Multicriteria Decis Aid Methodol Lab, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Joana Gusmao Children Hosp, State Secretary Hlth, BR-88025301 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
OR in health services; Clinical Engineering; Multicriteria analysis; Health technological process; Healthcare Technology Management;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.018
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In developing countries, approximately half of the healthcare equipments are not in full use and the main cause of this is the inadequate management of them. The Clinical Engineering might face this problem in the healthcare environment analyzing the equipment with a health technological process perspective to identify opportunities of improvements. Generally, the inadequate management is a result of lack of systemized and contextualized information about the health technological process. The effort to make an adequate management generates an increasing interest in the use of benchmarker. Currently, the benchmarkers used by the Clinical Engineering are not representative of a health technological process as a whole. Health technological process concept is stated in this article. The multicriteria analysis methodology MCDA (Multicriteria Decision Aid) is used to obtain benchmarkers and to identify opportunities of improvements, thus generating conditions for that the Clinical Engineering consolidates its relevant contribution for the healthcare. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 615
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Autio D. D., 2000, BIOMEDICAL ENG HDB
  • [2] BALVERDE NRM, 2006, THESIS U FEDERAL SAN
  • [3] Decision Support Systems in action:: Integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process
    Bana E Costa, CA
    Ensslin, L
    Corrêa, ÉC
    Vansnick, JC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 113 (02) : 315 - 335
  • [4] Ensslin L., 2000, International Transactions in Operational Research, V7, P79, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00186.x
  • [5] Ensslin L., 2001, Apoio a Decisao - Metodologias para Estruturacao de Problemas e Avaliacao Multicriterios de Alternativas
  • [6] Keeney RalphL., 2009, Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making
  • [7] LONGARAY A, 2004, THESIS U FEDERAL SAN
  • [8] *MIN SAUD PORT GM, 1998, 2920 MIN SAUD PORT G
  • [9] *MIN SAUD PORT SAS, 2004, 210 SAS MIN SAUD POR
  • [10] MORAES L, 2006, P WORLD C MED PHYS B, V14, P3533