Derivative preprocessing and optimal corrections for baseline drift in multivariate calibration

被引:115
作者
Brown, CD [1 ]
Vega-Montoto, L [1 ]
Wentzell, PD [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Chem, Trace Anal Res Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 4J3, Canada
关键词
preprocessing; baseline drift; derivative filtering; Savitzky-Golay; digital filter; multivariate calibration; maximum likelihood principal components regression; principal components regression;
D O I
10.1366/0003702001950571
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The characteristics of baseline drift are discussed from the perspective of error covariance. From this standpoint, the operation of derivative filters as preprocessing tools for multivariate calibration is explored. It is shown that convolution of derivative filter coefficients with the error covariance matrices for the data tend to reduce the contributions of correlated error, thereby reducing the presence of drift noise. This theory is corroborated by examination of experimental error covariance matrices before and after derivative preprocessing. It is proposed that maximum likelihood principal components analysis (MLPCA) is an optimal method for countering the deleterious effects of drift noise when the characteristics of that noise are known, since MLPCA uses error covariance information to perform a maximum likelihood projection of the data. In simulation and experimental studies, the performance of MLPCR and derivative-preprocessed PCR are compared to that of PCR with multivariate calibration data showing significant levels of drift. MLPCR is found to perform as well as or better than derivative PCR (with the best-suited derivative filter characteristics), provided that reasonable estimates of the drift noise characteristics are available. Recommendations are given for the use of MLPCR with poor estimates of the error covariance information.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1068
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] THEORY OF ANALYTICAL-CHEMISTRY
    BOOKSH, KS
    KOWALSKI, BR
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 66 (15) : A782 - A791
  • [2] Brown CD, 1999, J CHEMOMETR, V13, P133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199903/04)13:2<133::AID-CEM533>3.3.CO
  • [3] 2-3
  • [4] CAHILL JE, 1979, AM LAB, V11, P79
  • [5] A GENERALIZED-APPROACH TO DERIVATIVE SPECTROSCOPY
    CAMERON, DG
    MOFFATT, DJ
    [J]. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 1987, 41 (04) : 539 - 544
  • [6] THE INFLUENCE OF DATA PREPROCESSING ON THE ROBUSTNESS AND PARSIMONY OF MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION MODELS
    DENOORD, OE
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1994, 23 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [7] Faber K, 1997, J CHEMOMETR, V11, P419, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199709/10)11:5<419::AID-CEM486>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-#
  • [9] Multivariate sensitivity for the interpretation of the effect of spectral pretreatment methods on near-infrared calibration model predictions
    Faber, NM
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (03) : 557 - 565
  • [10] SOME ASPECTS OF THE SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF DERIVATIVE SPECTROSCOPY
    GRIFFITHS, TR
    KING, K
    HUBBARD, HVS
    SCHWINGWEILL, MJ
    MEULLEMEESTRE, J
    [J]. ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1982, 143 (01) : 163 - 176